Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1584448

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree

From Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree
Date 2017-02-20 10:50 +0100
Message-ID <tcSLw-2W4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tcKXD-6nh-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 02/20/2017 02:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
>
>    kernel/extable.c
>
> between commit:
>
>    74451e66d516 ("bpf: make jited programs visible in traces")
>
> from the net-next tree and commit:
>
>    5b485629ba0d ("kprobes, extable: Identify kprobes trampolines as kernel text area")
>
> from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Looks good to me, thanks!

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-02-20 02:30 +0100
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2017-02-20 10:50 +0100

csiph-web