Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1584448
| From | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree |
| Date | 2017-02-20 10:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tcSLw-2W4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tcKXD-6nh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 02/20/2017 02:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> kernel/extable.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 74451e66d516 ("bpf: make jited programs visible in traces")
>
> from the net-next tree and commit:
>
> 5b485629ba0d ("kprobes, extable: Identify kprobes trampolines as kernel text area")
>
> from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Looks good to me, thanks!
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-02-20 02:30 +0100 Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2017-02-20 10:50 +0100
csiph-web