Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1581593

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Introduce the initify gcc plugin

From Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Introduce the initify gcc plugin
Date 2017-02-15 20:30 +0100
Message-ID <tbdr3-42K-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <sYfAm-fa-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sYVpT-DA-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sYWYF-1Hr-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sYXi1-1Pf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <taVDP-tw-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:40:41 -0800
> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> WARNING: drivers/clk/bcm/built-in.o(.text+0xec2): Section mismatch in
>> reference from the function clk_gate() to the variable
>> .init.rodata.str:__func__.29708
>> The function clk_gate() references
>> the variable __initconst __func__.29708.
>> This is often because clk_gate lacks a __initconst
>> annotation or the annotation of __func__.29708 is wrong.
>
> Thanks for the report, it will be fixed in the next grsec patch.

Very cool, thanks! What did the problem turn out to be?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Introduce the initify gcc plugin Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 01:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Introduce the initify gcc plugin Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-02-15 20:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Introduce the initify gcc plugin Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 22:50 +0100

csiph-web