Re: [PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit

From	Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit
Date	2017-02-15 15:10 +0100
Message-ID	<tb8ro-107-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<taVaN-8vV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <taXFE-1Hw-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tb8ro-107-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Christopher Covington wrote:
> Nothing needs QDF2400 erratum 44. Software should try to detect the presence
> of the erratum. So I think qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present would
> make sense. But those suffixes don't add substantial value in my opinion.

I'd be okay with qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present.  I think it's a 
lot clearer.  Another idea is "has_qdf2400_e44".

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-15 01:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-15 03:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-15 15:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-15 15:10 +0100

csiph-web