Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1581225

Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] perf/amd/iommu: Enable multi-IOMMU support

From Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] perf/amd/iommu: Enable multi-IOMMU support
Date 2017-02-15 12:20 +0100
Message-ID <tb5MS-7Et-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t8GfT-4p7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tb4QN-75a-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tb5jP-7f2-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:44:24AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> does it say unsupported when you omit -a?

Yeah, it does dump the event name like it was counting but then it says
<not supported>. For example:

   <not supported>      amd_iommu_0/...

> [jolsa@krava perf]$ ./perf stat -e 'cpu/cpu-cycles/'
	 ^^^^^

Haha, I chuckle everytime I see this hostname :-)))

> > So, lemme ask perf tool people, can we guys make the -a thing default
> > when detect that we're running only uncore events which all should need
> > -a anyway?
> 
> it's possible, can't think of anything being hurt by this now..

Right, so Peter meant something simple like: you parse all events, see
that they're all uncore and enable system_wide if so.

I get the feeling that we want to do that for uncore-only events
anyway...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] perf/amd/iommu: Enable multi-IOMMU support Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-02-15 11:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] perf/amd/iommu: Enable multi-IOMMU support Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2017-02-15 11:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] perf/amd/iommu: Enable multi-IOMMU support Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-02-15 12:20 +0100

csiph-web