Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1581134
| From | Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] procfs: use an enum for possible hidepid values |
| Date | 2017-02-15 10:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tb3Bn-678-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t0fwd-WM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0fwe-WM-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tax8u-1hI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <taVNv-wP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:16:30 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com> wrote: >> > From: Lafcadio Wluiki <wluikil@gmail.com> >> > >> > Previously, the hidepid parameter was checked by comparing literal >> > integers 0, 1, 2. Let's add a proper enum for this, to make the checking >> > more expressive: >> > >> > 0 ___ HIDEPID_OFF >> > 1 ___ HIDEPID_NO_ACCESS >> > 2 ___ HIDEPID_INVISIBLE >> > >> > This changes the internal labelling only, the userspace-facing interface >> > remains unmodified, and still works with literal integers 0, 1, 2. >> > >> > No functional changes. >> > >> > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> >> > Acked-by: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Lafcadio Wluiki <wluikil@gmail.com> >> >> Andrew, can you take this? It's a sensible cleanup to drop literals in >> favor of defines. > > Sure. > > Djalal, I converted your acked-by into a signed-off-by, as described in > Documentation/SubmittingPatches (soon to become > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst). Thank you Andrew! -- tixxdz
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] procfs: use an enum for possible hidepid values Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-02-13 23:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] procfs: use an enum for possible hidepid values Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-15 01:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] procfs: use an enum for possible hidepid values Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 10:00 +0100
csiph-web