Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1579681
| From | Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: free reserved area's memmap if possiable |
| Date | 2017-02-13 13:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tanVw-3DB-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tanC9-3wl-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tanLQ-3A3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:17:00PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > Adding linux-arm-kernel and devicetree (look for "raw-pfn"), since this > impacts directly on those. > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:02:29PM +0800, zhouxianrong@huawei.com wrote: > > From: zhouxianrong <zhouxianrong@huawei.com> > > > > just like freeing no-map area's memmap we could free reserved > > area's memmap as well only when user of reserved area indicate > > that we can do this in dts or drivers. that is, user of reserved > > area know how to use the reserved area who could not memblock_free > > or free_reserved_xxx the reserved area and regard the area as raw > > pfn usage. the patch supply a way to users who want to utilize the > > memmap memory corresponding to raw pfn reserved areas as many as > > possible. > > I don't really understand this. Can you point me at a specific use-case, > please? Is CMA involved here? You don't need "dt permission" to free the memmap page array for the regions between memory areas. In fact, adding a DT property for that goes against the "DT describes the hardware not the implementation" requirement, since the memmap page array is a Linux implementation detail. 32-bit ARM has been freeing the memmap page array between memory areas for years since pre-DT days, and continues to do so. See free_unused_memmap(). -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm: free reserved area's memmap if possiable <zhouxianrong@huawei.com> - 2017-02-13 13:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: free reserved area's memmap if possiable Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-02-13 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: free reserved area's memmap if possiable Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2017-02-13 13:30 +0100
[PATCH] mm: free reserved area's memmap if possiable <zhouxianrong@huawei.com> - 2017-02-14 08:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: free reserved area's memmap if possiable zhouxianrong <zhouxianrong@huawei.com> - 2017-02-14 08:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: free reserved area's memmap if possiable Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-02-14 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: free reserved area's memmap if possiable zhouxianrong <zhouxianrong@huawei.com> - 2017-02-15 02:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: free reserved area's memmap if possiable Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-02-15 08:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: free reserved area's memmap if possiable zhouxianrong <zhouxianrong@huawei.com> - 2017-02-16 02:20 +0100
csiph-web