Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1579517
| From | Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled |
| Date | 2017-02-13 09:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <takbf-1ch-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tadt7-5ay-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tadt7-5ay-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tajyx-Is-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:45:06AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 05:15:01PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 05:13:55PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > Given the intent behind gpiod_get_optional() and friends it does not make > > > sense to return -ENOSYS when GPIOLIB is disabled: the driver is expected to > > > work just fine without gpio so let's behave as if gpio was not found. > > > Otherwise we have to special-case -ENOSYS in drivers. > > > > > > Note that there was objection that someone might forget to enable GPIOLIB > > > when dealing with a platform that has device that actually specifies > > > optional gpio and we'll break it. I find this unconvincing as that would > > > have to be the *only GPIO* in the system, which is extremely unlikely. > > > > > > Suggested-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> > > I don't like this patch and so I wonder what I wrote that could be > interpreted as suggesting this patch. For now I'd say only > > Nacked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> > > is justified. Oh, it seems I really sent such a RFC patch some time ago. Still I think it's wrong to do that and that we need something like a lookup-only-GPIOLIB that implements: def gpio_get_optional(...): if a gpio is specified: return -ENOSYS else: return NULL if you really want save some bytes and disable the full-fledged GPIOLIB. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2] gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 02:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 02:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> - 2017-02-13 08:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> - 2017-02-13 09:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 09:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> - 2017-02-13 10:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-02-22 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 19:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-02-22 20:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-02-22 19:50 +0100
csiph-web