Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1580717
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX operation is on |
| Date | 2017-02-14 18:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <taPoK-4Ol-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <taLl8-2pq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <taLuN-2sF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Em Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 03:24:16PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin escreveu:
> On systems where PT does not coexist with VMX, users get confused when
> PT turns up with no data because they forgot they're running a kvm
> session at the same time.
>
> This patch adds a preemptive check for any active VMX operations that
> will fail event creation. This does not provide any guarantees or
> protection against racing with a kvm starting in parallel, but is
> intended to serve as a hint for the user. If VMXON happens after an
> event had been created, the event will still produce an empty trace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Reported-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Yeah, I saw that as well, and Andi told me about this limitation, so,
for quite a while now, everytime I need to test PT on the only machine I
have with it, I have to stop my kvm sessions :-\
Thanks for working on this!
- Arnaldo
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
> index 9372fa4549..b1490a879c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
> @@ -1444,6 +1444,20 @@ static void pt_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event)
>
> static int pt_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> + int cpu, vmx_on = 0;
> +
> + get_online_cpus();
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + struct pt *pt = per_cpu_ptr(&pt_ctx, cpu);
> +
> + if (READ_ONCE(pt->vmx_on))
> + vmx_on++;
> + }
> + put_online_cpus();
> +
> + if (vmx_on)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> if (event->attr.type != pt_pmu.pmu.type)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> --
> 2.11.0
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: VMX related updates Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-14 14:30 +0100
[PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX operation is on Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-14 14:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX operation is on Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-14 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX operation is on Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-02-14 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX operation is on Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-15 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX operation is on Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-15 10:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX operation is on Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-15 14:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX operation is on Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-02-15 14:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX operation is on Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-15 14:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX operation is on Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-02-15 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX operation is on Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-15 14:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX operation is on Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-02-15 14:20 +0100
[PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event scheduling on conflict with VMX Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-14 14:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event scheduling on conflict with VMX Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-14 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event scheduling on conflict with VMX Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-14 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event scheduling on conflict with VMX Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-14 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event scheduling on conflict with VMX Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-14 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event scheduling on conflict with VMX Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-14 19:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event scheduling on conflict with VMX Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-14 20:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event scheduling on conflict with VMX Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-15 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event scheduling on conflict with VMX Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-15 10:00 +0100
csiph-web