Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1680914
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: attach extra runtime to the right avg |
| Date | 2017-07-04 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tZv7Q-89B-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tXTnX-7gP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tYJwd-846-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tZsCZ-6u0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tZt61-6UJ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 12:13:09PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > This code on the other hand: > > sa->last_update_time += delta << 10; > > ... in essence creates a whole new absolute clock value that slowly but surely is > drifting away from the real rq->clock, because 'delta' is always rounded down to > the nearest 1024 ns boundary, so we accumulate the 'remainder' losses. > > That is because: > > delta >>= 10; > ... > sa->last_update_time += delta << 10; > > Given enough time, ->last_update_time can drift a long way, and this delta: > > delta = now - sa->last_update_time; > > ... becomes meaningless AFAICS, because it's essentially two different clocks that > get compared. Thing is, once you drift over 1023 (ns) your delta increases and you catch up again. A B C D E F | | | | | | +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ A: now = 0 sa->last_update_time = 0 delta := (now - sa->last_update_time) >> 10 = 0 B: now = 614 (+614) delta = (614 - 0) >> 10 = 0 sa->last_update_time += 0 (0) sa->last_update_time = now & ~1023 (0) C: now = 1843 (+1229) delta = (1843 - 0) >> 10 = 1 sa->last_update_time += 1024 (1024) sa->last_update_time = now & ~1023 (1024) D: now = 3481 (+1638) delta = (3481 - 1024) >> 10 = 2 sa->last_update_time += 2048 (3072) sa->last_update_time = now & ~1023 (3072) E: now = 5734 (+2253) delta = (5734 - 3072) = 2 sa->last_update_time += 2048 (5120) sa->last_update_time = now & ~1023 (5120) F: now = 6348 (+614) delta = (6348 - 5120) >> 10 = 1 sa->last_update_time += 1024 (6144) sa->last_update_time = now & ~1023 (6144) And you'll see that both are identical, and that both D and F have gotten a spill from sub-chunk accounting.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: attach extra runtime to the right avg Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-04 11:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: attach extra runtime to the right avg Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-07-04 12:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: attach extra runtime to the right avg Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-04 14:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: attach extra runtime to the right avg Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> - 2017-07-04 14:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: attach extra runtime to the right avg Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-04 14:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: attach extra runtime to the right avg Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> - 2017-07-04 16:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: attach extra runtime to the right avg Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-04 16:30 +0200
csiph-web