Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1681655
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Potential scheduler regression |
| Date | 2017-07-05 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tZVEZ-ke-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tZUIW-89P-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 11:42:46AM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been in the process of updating our kernel in our appliance VM
> from an old LTS kernel (4.1.y) to something a bit more modern (4.9.y)
> - and ran into a performance regression, when our QA team was running
> some regression suites.
>
>
> I bisect this behavior to the following commit, introduced in the 4.9
> merge window:
>
Could you test a later kernel that includes commit:
1ad3aaf3fcd2 ("sched/core: Implement new approach to scale select_idle_cpu()")
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Potential scheduler regression Ben Guthro <ben@guthro.net> - 2017-07-05 17:50 +0200
Re: Potential scheduler regression Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-05 18:50 +0200
Re: Potential scheduler regression Ben Guthro <ben@guthro.net> - 2017-07-07 23:00 +0200
Re: Potential scheduler regression Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-10 11:30 +0200
Re: Potential scheduler regression Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-10 17:30 +0200
Re: Potential scheduler regression Ben Guthro <ben@guthro.net> - 2017-07-10 17:50 +0200
Re: Potential scheduler regression Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-07-11 10:40 +0200
Re: Potential scheduler regression Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-11 12:00 +0200
Re: Potential scheduler regression Ben Guthro <ben@guthro.net> - 2017-07-13 21:30 +0200
Re: Potential scheduler regression Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-14 09:00 +0200
csiph-web