Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1679540

Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] x86/apic: Construct a selector for the interrupt delivery mode

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
> +static int __init apic_intr_mode_select(void)
> +{
> +	/* Check kernel option */
> +	if (disable_apic) {
> +		pr_info("APIC disabled via kernel command line\n");
> +		return APIC_PIC;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Check BIOS */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +	/* On 64-bit, the APIC must be integrated, Check local APIC only */
> +	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC)) {
> +		disable_apic = 1;
> +		pr_info("APIC disabled by BIOS\n");
> +		return APIC_PIC;
> +	}
> +#else
> +	/*
> +	 * On 32-bit, check whether there is a separate chip or integrated
> +	 * APIC
> +	 */
> +
> +	/* Has a local APIC ? */
> +	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC) &&
> +		APIC_INTEGRATED(boot_cpu_apic_version)) {

This looks wrong. The existing logic is:

	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC) && !smp_found_config)
		return -1;

	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC) &&
	                APIC_INTEGRATED(boot_cpu_apic_version)) {
		pr_err(....);

I know that this is magically the same because boot_cpu_apic_version is 0
in the !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC) && !smp_found_config case, so you
don't fall into that conditional, but it's completely non obvious and does
not really make the code more understandable. Quite the contrary.

> +		disable_apic = 1;
> +		pr_err(FW_BUG "Local APIC %d not detected, force emulation\n",
> +				       boot_cpu_physical_apicid);
> +		return APIC_PIC;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Has a separate chip ? */
> +	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC) && !smp_found_config) {
> +		disable_apic = 1;
> +
> +		return APIC_PIC;
> +	}

So if you move exactly that check above the other then it's clear what's
going on.

> +#endif
> +
> +	/* Check MP table or ACPI MADT configuration */
> +	if (!smp_found_config) {
> +		disable_ioapic_support();
> +
> +		if (!acpi_lapic)
> +			pr_info("APIC: ACPI MADT or MP tables are not detected\n");
> +
> +		return APIC_VIRTUAL_WIRE;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Other checks of APIC options will be done in each setup function */
> +

Please remove the extra new line. It's not helping readability.

> +	return APIC_SYMMETRIC_IO;
> +}

Thanks,

	tglx

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v5 01/12] x86/apic: Construct a selector for the interrupt delivery mode Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2017-06-30 06:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] x86/apic: Construct a selector for the interrupt  delivery mode Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-07-02 19:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] x86/apic: Construct a selector for the interrupt  delivery mode Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2017-07-03 03:50 +0200

csiph-web