Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1676689

Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the injected #PF is async_pf

From Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the injected #PF is async_pf
Date 2017-06-28 16:10 +0200
Message-ID <tXlPk-7Na-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tXkgy-6Kh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tXkgy-6Kh-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tXkJA-6TW-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tXlmh-7nt-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tXlvX-7r0-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


2017-06-28 21:48 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>:
>
>
> On 28/06/2017 15:38, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> Radim, Wanpeng,
>>>
>>> the patch is nice now but I'm still not 100% sure about the live
>>> migration part.  Why do we need to pass nested_apf to userspace, but not
>>> nested_apf_token?
>>
>> We do not need it for migration, but unavailable nested_apf_token
>> already breaks checkpoint & restore from userspace ... I think the
>> cleanest way would be to add a new paravirtual event for nested_apf.
>> (Or just keep delaying the apf.)
>
> Indeed.  With Jim's plans to migrate nested virt data, I was wondering
> if nested_apf and nested_apf_token would be better placed in that ioctl,
> rather than GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS.
>
> Nested-virt migration is broken anyway until we have Jim's patches, so
> there's little point in migrating nested_apf only.  Do you agree?
>
>> Migration does a "async-pf-broadcast" while setting the async-pf MSR on
>> destination, which resumes all async-pf waiters.
>> Userspace actually has to drop the async-pf event on migration, because
>> the destination has invalid nested_apf_token.  (It's a horrible design.)
>
> Yes, this was my question essentially.  I would still migrate
> nested_apf_token (as part of nested virt state), and then clear it in
> KVM when doing the async-pf broadcast.

Do you mean I should save nested_apf_token by GET_VCPU_EVENTS and
restore it by SET_VCPU_EVENTS? I utilize the place of "u8 pad" in
kvm_vcpu_events to hold nested_apf, however nested_apf_token is
unsigned long.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v6 0/4] KVM: async_pf: Fix async pf exception injection Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 14:30 +0200
  [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the injected #PF is async_pf Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 14:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the  injected #PF is async_pf Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-06-28 15:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the  injected #PF is async_pf Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2017-06-28 15:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the  injected #PF is async_pf Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-06-28 15:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the  injected #PF is async_pf Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 16:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the  injected #PF is async_pf Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 16:20 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the  injected #PF is async_pf Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 16:30 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the  injected #PF is async_pf Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-06-28 16:30 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the  injected #PF is async_pf Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-06-28 16:20 +0200
  [PATCH v6 1/4] KVM: x86: Simple kvm_x86_ops->queue_exception parameter Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 14:30 +0200

csiph-web