Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1676637

Re: 4.12.0-rc6+: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM hci0:hci_power_off is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:btusb_work

From Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: 4.12.0-rc6+: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM hci0:hci_power_off is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:btusb_work
Date 2017-06-28 15:00 +0200
Message-ID <tXkJz-6TW-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tWksi-8vA-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tX0Bc-2nz-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <tX2tk-3Gw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tX2MF-3Ox-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hej Tejun and Marcel,

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:39:46PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Marcel.
> 
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 07:28:40PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > >> On my Dell XPS 13 9343 (x86_64), the following warning was logged right
> > >> after a resume from suspend-to-mem (not on *every* resume, though, so it
> > >> might be hard to reproduce). The kernel is v4.12.0-rc6+ as of 94a6df251dd0,
> > >> and I don't really use bluetooth, though the drivers are loaded:
> > >> 
> > >> PM: Finishing wakeup.
> > >> OOM killer enabled.
> > >> Restarting tasks ... done.
> > >> Bluetooth: hci0: read Intel version: 370710018002030d00
> > >> Bluetooth: hci0: Intel Bluetooth firmware file: intel/ibt-hw-37.7.10-fw-1.80.2.3.d.bseq
> > >> Bluetooth: hci0: Intel Bluetooth firmware patch completed and activated
> > >> ... <more, unrelated messages>
> > >> workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM hci0:hci_power_off is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:btusb_work
> > > 
> > > So, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM has to be transitive; otherwise, it doesn't mean
> > > anything.  I have a hard time believing that bluetooth actually needs
> > > WQ_MEM_RECLAIM unless people mount nfs through a bluetooth tethered
> > > phone.  Would it be possible to remove WQ_MEM_RECLAIM from these
> > > workqueues?
> > 
> > frankly I do not remember. We used what was recommended to use. I
> > know that the only requirement in one case is that it is a truly
> > single workqueue.
> 
> Heh, I don't remember either.  I wonder whether there is an existing
> dependency chain from network side which triggers the warning.
> Dominik, can you please see whether the following patch makes the
> warning go away while not triggering new ones?

Alas, the warning was not reproducible beforehand -- with the patch applied,
no warning was emitted during a few suspend-and-resume cycles. Whether
bluetooth still works as expected, I cannot tell, as I do not use it.

Thanks,

	Dominik

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

4.12.0-rc6+: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM hci0:hci_power_off is flushing  !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:btusb_work Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> - 2017-06-25 20:30 +0200
  Re: 4.12.0-rc6+: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM hci0:hci_power_off is flushing  !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:btusb_work Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-06-27 17:30 +0200
    Re: 4.12.0-rc6+: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM hci0:hci_power_off is flushing  !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:btusb_work Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> - 2017-06-27 19:30 +0200
      Re: 4.12.0-rc6+: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM hci0:hci_power_off is flushing  !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:btusb_work Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-06-27 19:50 +0200
        Re: 4.12.0-rc6+: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM hci0:hci_power_off is flushing  !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:btusb_work Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> - 2017-06-28 15:00 +0200
          [PATCH] bluetooth: remove WQ_MEM_RECLAIM from hci workqueues Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-06-28 20:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] bluetooth: remove WQ_MEM_RECLAIM from hci workqueues Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> - 2017-06-29 14:40 +0200

csiph-web