Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1678118
| From | Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v2 3/9] Creation of "check_vmflags" LSM hook |
| Date | 2017-06-29 21:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tXNix-3bX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tSG81-4QO-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSG82-4QO-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <tX7Mm-7kb-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
2017-06-28 1:05 GMT+02:00 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Salvatore Mesoraca > <s.mesoraca16@gmail.com> wrote: >> Creation of a new LSM hook to check if a given configuration of vmflags, >> for a new memory allocation request, should be allowed or not. >> It's placed in "do_mmap", "do_brk_flags" and "__install_special_mapping". > > I like this. I think this is something the other LSMs should be > checking too. (Though I wonder if it would be helpful to include the > VMA in the hook, though it does exist yet, so... hmm.) For the particular case of my LSM and the type of check it does, the VMA isn't needed, of course. Maybe some other LSM can benefit from it, but it depends on what they want to do with this hook. Looking forward to feedback from potential future users. Thank you for your interest. Salvatore
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC v2 3/9] Creation of "check_vmflags" LSM hook Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-06-28 01:10 +0200 Re: [RFC v2 3/9] Creation of "check_vmflags" LSM hook Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:30 +0200
csiph-web