Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1678099
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters |
| Date | 2017-06-29 21:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tXMZe-354-65@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tVGlc-9V-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tWK3n-7Ki-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tWLLQ-wL-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tWLVv-AA-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tWMoy-10J-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > * As a side effect of this; the data structures are slimmer. > * >- * One would recommend using this wait queue where possible. >+ * NOTE: swait is for cases of extreme memory considerations and some very >+ * special realtime issues, where it saves a couple of bytes in structures that >+ * need close packing. As such its very special-use. Consider using regular >+ * waits queues from wait.h instead *first*. How about the following? diff --git a/include/linux/swait.h b/include/linux/swait.h index 4a4e180d0a35..f72f274f2a5f 100644 --- a/include/linux/swait.h +++ b/include/linux/swait.h @@ -9,13 +9,16 @@ /* * Simple wait queues * - * While these are very similar to the other/complex wait queues (wait.h) the - * most important difference is that the simple waitqueue allows for - * deterministic behaviour -- IOW it has strictly bounded IRQ and lock hold - * times. + * While these are very similar to regular wait queues (wait.h) the most + * important difference is that the simple waitqueue allows for deterministic + * behaviour -- IOW it has strictly bounded IRQ and lock hold times. * - * In order to make this so, we had to drop a fair number of features of the - * other waitqueue code; notably: + * Mainly, this is accomplished by two things. Firstly not allowing swake_up_all + * from IRQ disabled, and dropping the lock upon every wakeup, giving a higher + * priority task a chance to run. + * + * Secondly, we had to drop a fair number of features of the other waitqueue + * code; notably: * * - mixing INTERRUPTIBLE and UNINTERRUPTIBLE sleeps on the same waitqueue; * all wakeups are TASK_NORMAL in order to avoid O(n) lookups for the right @@ -24,12 +27,14 @@ * - the exclusive mode; because this requires preserving the list order * and this is hard. * - * - custom wake functions; because you cannot give any guarantees about - * random code. - * - * As a side effect of this; the data structures are slimmer. + * - custom wake callback functions; because you cannot give any guarantees + * about random code. This also allows swait to be used in RT, such that + * raw spinlock can be used for the swait queue head. * - * One would recommend using this wait queue where possible. + * As a side effect of these; the data structures are slimmer albeit more ad-hoc. + * For all the above, note that simple wait queues should _only_ be used under + * very specific realtime constraints -- it is best to stick with the regular + * wait queues in most cases. */ struct task_struct;
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> - 2017-06-24 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-26 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-27 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> - 2017-06-27 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-27 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> - 2017-06-27 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-28 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> - 2017-06-28 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-28 02:00 +0200
Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de> - 2017-06-28 09:10 +0200
Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-28 18:10 +0200
Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de> - 2017-06-28 20:00 +0200
Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-28 20:00 +0200
Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org> - 2017-06-29 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2017-06-27 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-27 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2017-06-27 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-27 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2017-06-27 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-27 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-26 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-27 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-27 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-27 02:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2017-06-28 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-28 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2017-06-28 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2017-06-29 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-29 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2017-06-30 18:40 +0200
csiph-web