Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1676013
| From | Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM: memblock limit must be pmd-aligned |
| Date | 2017-06-27 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tX2jD-3CN-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tWFZL-5dU-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tWLVw-AA-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tWN1g-1h7-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tWWxz-84J-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tX20i-3fI-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 09:57:17AM -0700, Doug Berger wrote: > On 06/27/2017 03:59 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 05:50:03PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote: > >> On 06/26/2017 04:43 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: > >>> On 06/26/2017 10:23 AM, Doug Berger wrote: > >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c > >>>> index 31af3cb59a60..2ae4f9c9d757 100644 > >>>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c > >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c > >>>> @@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@ void __init adjust_lowmem_bounds(void) > >>>> if (memblock_limit) > >>>> memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, PMD_SIZE); > >>>> if (!memblock_limit) > >>>> - memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit; > >>>> + memblock_limit = round_down(arm_lowmem_limit, PMD_SIZE); > >>>> > > > > Given we're always going to do the rounding, how about we move that out > > of the existing conditional, i.e. get rid of the first if, and have: > > > > if (!memblock_limit) > > memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit; > > > > /* > > * Round the memblock limit down to a pmd size. This > > * helps to ensure that we will allocate memory from the > > * last full pmd, which should be mapped. > > */ > > memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, PMD_SIZE); > > > > Thanks, > > Mark. > That makes perfect sense to me. I will submit a v2 with this code > change. Should I add your Signed-off-by since it is your change? Since you're writing the patch, there's no need. Feel free to add my Suggested-by if you want, but I'm not too worried either way. Thanks, Mark.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] ARM: memblock limit must be pmd-aligned Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: memblock limit must be pmd-aligned Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2017-06-27 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: memblock limit must be pmd-aligned Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 03:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: memblock limit must be pmd-aligned Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-06-27 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: memblock limit must be pmd-aligned Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: memblock limit must be pmd-aligned Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2017-06-27 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: memblock limit must be pmd-aligned Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-06-27 19:20 +0200
csiph-web