Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1675830

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/core: Fail atomic IOCTL with no CRTC state but with signaling.

Show all headers | View raw

Op 27-06-17 om 09:37 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 03:44:07PM -0400, Harry Wentland wrote:
>> On 2017-06-20 01:57 PM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
>>> Problem : While running IGT kms_atomic_transition test suite i encountered
>>> a hang in drmHandleEvent immediately following  an atomic_commit.
>>> After dumping the atomic state I relized that in this case there was
>>> not even one CRTC attached to the state and only disabled
>>> planes. This probably due to a commit which hadn't changed any property
>>> which would require attaching crtc state. This means drmHandleEvent
>>> will never wake up from read since without CRTC in atomic state
>>> the event fd will not be signaled.
>>>
>>> Fix: Protect against this issue by failing atomic_commit early in
>>> drm_mode_atomic_commit where such probelm can be identified.
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> Fix typos and extra newlines.
>>>
>>> Change-Id: I3ee28ffae35fd1e8bfe553146c44da53da02e6f8
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <Andrey.Grodzovsky@amd.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
> Stalling on this hoping for the igt patch. Does it exist already?
> -Daniel
>
>> Harry
>>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
>>> index a567310..48145bf 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
>>> @@ -1933,7 +1933,7 @@ static int prepare_crtc_signaling(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>  {
>>>  	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>>>  	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>>> -	int i, ret;
>>> +	int i, c = 0, ret;
>>>  
>>>  	if (arg->flags & DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY)
>>>  		return 0;
>>> @@ -1994,8 +1994,17 @@ static int prepare_crtc_signaling(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>  
>>>  			crtc_state->event->base.fence = fence;
>>>  		}
>>> +
>>> +		c++;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Having this flag means user mode pends on event which will never
>>> +	 * reach due to lack of at least one CRTC for signaling
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (c == 0 && (arg->flags & DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_EVENT))
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>
Just do it, and I'll commit this to igt?

diff --git a/tests/kms_atomic.c b/tests/kms_atomic.c
index 6375fede7179..77429b3db384 100644
--- a/tests/kms_atomic.c
+++ b/tests/kms_atomic.c
@@ -1205,6 +1205,15 @@ static void crtc_invalid_params(struct kms_atomic_crtc_state *crtc_old,
 	crtc_commit_atomic(&crtc, plane, req, ATOMIC_RELAX_NONE,
 			   DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY);
 
+	/*
+	 * TEST_ONLY cannot be combined with DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_EVENT,
+	 * but DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_EVENT will always generate EINVAL
+	 * without valid crtc, so test it here.
+	 */
+	crtc_commit_atomic_err(&crtc, plane, req, ATOMIC_RELAX_NONE,
+			       DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY | DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_EVENT,
+			       EINVAL);
+
 	/* Create a blob which is the wrong size to be a valid mode. */
 	do_or_die(drmModeCreatePropertyBlob(crtc.state->desc->fd,
 					    crtc.mode.data,
@@ -1356,12 +1365,12 @@ static void atomic_invalid_params(struct kms_atomic_crtc_state *crtc,
 	/* Valid pointers, but still should copy nothing. */
 	do_ioctl(desc->fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ATOMIC, &ioc);
 
-	/* Nonsense flags. */
-	ioc.flags = 0xdeadbeef;
+	/* Valid noop, but with event set should fail. */
+	ioc.flags = DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_EVENT;
 	do_ioctl_err(desc->fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ATOMIC, &ioc, EINVAL);
 
-	/* Specifically forbidden combination. */
-	ioc.flags = DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY | DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_EVENT;
+	/* Nonsense flags. */
+	ioc.flags = 0xdeadbeef;
 	do_ioctl_err(desc->fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ATOMIC, &ioc, EINVAL);
 
 	ioc.flags = 0;

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/core: Fail atomic IOCTL with no CRTC state but  with signaling. Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> - 2017-06-27 09:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] drm/core: Fail atomic IOCTL with no CRTC state but  with signaling. Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> - 2017-06-27 16:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] drm/core: Fail atomic IOCTL with no CRTC state but  with signaling. Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> - 2017-06-27 17:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2] drm/core: Fail atomic IOCTL with no CRTC state but  with signaling. Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> - 2017-06-28 12:30 +0200

csiph-web