Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1675402
| From | Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i |
| Date | 2017-06-27 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tWTJn-69e-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tN6eR-1Kf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN6eT-1Kf-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <tWq4F-3y0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:18:23AM +0100, André Przywara wrote: > On 31/05/17 08:18, Corentin Labbe wrote: > > The dwmac-sun8i is a heavy hacked version of stmmac hardware by > > allwinner. > > In fact the only common part is the descriptor management and the first > > register function. > > Hi, > > I know I am a bit late with this, but while adapting the U-Boot driver > to the new binding I was wondering about the internal PHY detection: > > > So here you seem to deduce the usage of the internal PHY by the PHY > interface specified in the DT (MII = internal, RGMII = external). > I think I raised this question before, but isn't it perfectly legal for > a board to use MII with an external PHY even on those SoCs that feature > an internal PHY? > On the first glance that does not make too much sense, but apart from > not being the correct binding to describe all of the SoCs features I see > two scenarios: > 1) A board vendor might choose to not use the internal PHY because it > has bugs, lacks features (configurability) or has other issues. For > instance I have heard reports that the internal PHY makes the SoC go > rather hot, possibly limiting the CPU frequency. By using an external > MII PHY (which are still cheaper than RGMII PHYs) this can be avoided. > 2) A PHY does not necessarily need to be directly connected to > magnetics. Indeed quite some boards use (RG)MII to connect to a switch > IC or some other network circuitry, for instance fibre connectors. > > So I was wondering if we would need an explicit: > allwinner,use-internal-phy; > boolean DT property to signal the usage of the internal PHY? > Alternatively we could go with the negative version: > allwinner,disable-internal-phy; > > Or what about introducing a new "allwinner,internal-mii-phy" compatible > string for the *PHY* node and use that? > > I just want to avoid that we introduce a binding that causes us > headaches later. I think we can still fix this with a followup patch > before the driver and its binding hit a release kernel. > > Cheers, > Andre. > I just see some patch, where "phy-mode = internal" is valid. I will try to find a way to use it Regards
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2017-06-26 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> - 2017-06-27 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2017-06-27 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-06-27 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> - 2017-06-27 12:20 +0200
Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> - 2017-06-27 12:20 +0200
Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> - 2017-06-27 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2017-06-27 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> - 2017-06-27 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2017-06-27 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-06-27 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 09:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-07-02 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-06-27 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> - 2017-06-27 12:30 +0200
csiph-web