Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1675402

Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i

From Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i
Date 2017-06-27 10:10 +0200
Message-ID <tWTJn-69e-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tN6eR-1Kf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN6eT-1Kf-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <tWq4F-3y0-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:18:23AM +0100, André Przywara wrote:
> On 31/05/17 08:18, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > The dwmac-sun8i is a heavy hacked version of stmmac hardware by
> > allwinner.
> > In fact the only common part is the descriptor management and the first
> > register function.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I know I am a bit late with this, but while adapting the U-Boot driver
> to the new binding I was wondering about the internal PHY detection:
> 
> 
> So here you seem to deduce the usage of the internal PHY by the PHY
> interface specified in the DT (MII = internal, RGMII = external).
> I think I raised this question before, but isn't it perfectly legal for
> a board to use MII with an external PHY even on those SoCs that feature
> an internal PHY?
> On the first glance that does not make too much sense, but apart from
> not being the correct binding to describe all of the SoCs features I see
> two scenarios:
> 1) A board vendor might choose to not use the internal PHY because it
> has bugs, lacks features (configurability) or has other issues. For
> instance I have heard reports that the internal PHY makes the SoC go
> rather hot, possibly limiting the CPU frequency. By using an external
> MII PHY (which are still cheaper than RGMII PHYs) this can be avoided.
> 2) A PHY does not necessarily need to be directly connected to
> magnetics. Indeed quite some boards use (RG)MII to connect to a switch
> IC or some other network circuitry, for instance fibre connectors.
> 
> So I was wondering if we would need an explicit:
> 	allwinner,use-internal-phy;
> boolean DT property to signal the usage of the internal PHY?
> Alternatively we could go with the negative version:
> 	allwinner,disable-internal-phy;
> 
> Or what about introducing a new "allwinner,internal-mii-phy" compatible
> string for the *PHY* node and use that?
> 
> I just want to avoid that we introduce a binding that causes us
> headaches later. I think we can still fix this with a followup patch
> before the driver and its binding hit a release kernel.
> 
> Cheers,
> Andre.
> 

I just see some patch, where "phy-mode = internal" is valid.
I will try to find a way to use it

Regards

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2017-06-26 02:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 10:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> - 2017-06-27 10:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 10:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2017-06-27 11:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-06-27 11:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> - 2017-06-27 12:20 +0200
              Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> - 2017-06-27 12:20 +0200
                Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> - 2017-06-27 12:30 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2017-06-27 12:20 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> - 2017-06-27 12:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2017-06-27 12:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 14:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-06-27 19:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 19:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 19:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 09:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 23:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-07-02 10:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-06-27 18:10 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] net-next: stmmac: Add dwmac-sun8i Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> - 2017-06-27 12:30 +0200

csiph-web