Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1675330
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems |
| Date | 2017-06-27 08:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tWStX-57j-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tUd1U-8vL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUd1U-8vL-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tVkkF-3iz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tVmPw-4MO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tWRHz-4zw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Tom Lanyon <tom@oneshoeco.com> wrote: > On 23 June 2017 at 12:40, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > Linux during s2idle => 6% battery drain per hour. > Win10 during sleep => 1% battery drain per hour. > > where Linux = 4.12-rc6 + the latest patch from your acpi-pm-test branch. > > So whilst s2idle halves the battery drain compared to the machine > staying powered on, it's still significantly more draining than Win10. > Let me know if there's any more useful analysis I can do. Tom, thanks for this. I would speculate that the problem might be in the certain device drivers. It would be nice to get statistics which wakeup source generates more hits. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-06-23 02:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-23 04:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems Tom Lanyon <tom@oneshoeco.com> - 2017-06-27 08:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems Tom Lanyon <tom@oneshoeco.com> - 2017-06-27 13:00 +0200
RE: [PATCH] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> - 2017-06-27 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-06-27 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2017-06-27 18:20 +0200
RE: [PATCH] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-06-23 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-06-23 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-06-23 14:40 +0200
[PATCH v2] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-06-23 15:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH v2] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> - 2017-06-23 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2017-06-23 18:10 +0200
RE: [PATCH v2] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> - 2017-06-23 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-06-24 03:00 +0200
csiph-web