Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1674896
| From | Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] remoteproc/keystone: Add a remoteproc driver for Keystone 2 DSPs |
| Date | 2017-06-26 18:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tWEAG-4e5-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tS3Jo-5XL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tS3Jo-5XL-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tWmaJ-1b8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Bjorn,
On 06/25/2017 03:15 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 13 Jun 16:45 PDT 2017, Suman Anna wrote:
>
>> +static int keystone_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct keystone_rproc *ksproc = rproc->priv;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + INIT_WORK(&ksproc->workqueue, handle_event);
>> +
>> + ret = request_irq(ksproc->irq_ring, keystone_rproc_vring_interrupt, 0,
>> + dev_name(ksproc->dev), ksproc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(ksproc->dev, "failed to enable vring interrupt, ret = %d\n",
>> + ret);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = request_irq(ksproc->irq_fault, keystone_rproc_exception_interrupt,
>> + 0, dev_name(ksproc->dev), ksproc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(ksproc->dev, "failed to enable exception interrupt, ret = %d\n",
>> + ret);
>> + goto free_vring_irq;
>> + }
>
> I do prefer that your request any resources during probe() and
> potentially enable/disable them here. If below concern about using a
> GPIO driver is cleared already I'll take it as is though.
>
> [..]
>> +static void keystone_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
>> +{
>> + struct keystone_rproc *ksproc = rproc->priv;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(ksproc->kick_gpio < 0))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + gpio_set_value(ksproc->kick_gpio, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>
> This doesn't sound like a gpio-controller and the GPIO maintainer did
> reject an attempt by me to use the GPIO framework to abstract a similar
> thing. Do you already have this driver upstream or have you clarified
> with the maintainer that the GPIO framework is an acceptable abstraction
> for this?
Yeah, this has been upstream since quite some time. See commit
2134cb997f2f ("gpio: syscon: reuse for keystone 2 socs").
regards
Suman
>
> It looks equivalent to the "APCS IPC" register found in Qualcomm
> platforms, previously implemented through a syscon but in v4.13 being
> pushed to being a mailbox driver.
>
>
> Apart from this I think the series looks good.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] remoteproc/keystone: Add a remoteproc driver for Keystone 2 DSPs Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2017-06-25 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] remoteproc/keystone: Add a remoteproc driver for Keystone 2 DSPs Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> - 2017-06-26 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] remoteproc/keystone: Add a remoteproc driver for Keystone 2 DSPs Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2017-06-26 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] remoteproc/keystone: Add a remoteproc driver for Keystone 2 DSPs Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> - 2017-06-26 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] remoteproc/keystone: Add a remoteproc driver for Keystone 2 DSPs Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2017-06-26 23:30 +0200
csiph-web