Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1674787
| From | "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: replace writel with writel_relaxed in queue_inc_prod |
| Date | 2017-06-26 15:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tWCpc-2Xw-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tUpcK-7R1-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUpFM-81d-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUCCZ-7Q6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUJOa-4bl-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2017/6/21 17:08, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:28:23AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: >> On 2017/6/20 19:35, Robin Murphy wrote: >>> On 20/06/17 12:04, Zhen Lei wrote: >>>> This function is protected by spinlock, and the latter will do memory >>>> barrier implicitly. So that we can safely use writel_relaxed. In fact, the >>>> dmb operation will lengthen the time protected by lock, which indirectly >>>> increase the locking confliction in the stress scene. >>> >>> If you remove the DSB between writing the commands (to Normal memory) >>> and writing the pointer (to Device memory), how can you guarantee that >>> the complete command is visible to the SMMU and it isn't going to try to >>> consume stale memory contents? The spinlock is irrelevant since it's >>> taken *before* the command is written. >> OK, I see, thanks. Let's me see if there are any other methods. And I think >> that this may should be done well by hardware. > > FWIW, I did use the _relaxed variants wherever I could when I wrote the > driver. There might, of course, be bugs, but it's not like the normal case > for drivers where the author didn't consider the _relaxed accessors > initially. A good news. I got a new idea and I will post v2 later. > > Will > > . > -- Thanks! BestRegards
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: replace writel with writel_relaxed in queue_inc_prod Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2017-06-20 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: replace writel with writel_relaxed in queue_inc_prod Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2017-06-20 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: replace writel with writel_relaxed in queue_inc_prod "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2017-06-21 03:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: replace writel with writel_relaxed in queue_inc_prod Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-06-21 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: replace writel with writel_relaxed in queue_inc_prod "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2017-06-26 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: replace writel with writel_relaxed in queue_inc_prod "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2017-06-26 15:50 +0200
csiph-web