Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1673548

Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc.c: eliminate unsigned confusion in __rmqueue_fallback

From Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc.c: eliminate unsigned confusion in __rmqueue_fallback
Date 2017-06-23 15:20 +0200
Message-ID <tVwFb-2Eg-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tUKqS-4oF-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUT18-1FF-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 06/21/2017 08:55 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Since current_order starts as MAX_ORDER-1 and is then only
> decremented, the second half of the loop condition seems
> superfluous. However, if order is 0, we may decrement current_order
> past 0, making it UINT_MAX. This is obviously too subtle ([1], [2]).
> 
> Since we need to add some comment anyway, change the two variables to
> signed, making the counting-down for loop look more familiar, and
> apparently also making gcc generate slightly smaller code.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/20/493
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/19/345
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

> ---
> Michal, something like this, perhaps?
> 
> mm/page_alloc.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 2302f250d6b1..e656f4da9772 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2204,19 +2204,23 @@ static bool unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(const struct alloc_context *ac,
>   * list of requested migratetype, possibly along with other pages from the same
>   * block, depending on fragmentation avoidance heuristics. Returns true if
>   * fallback was found so that __rmqueue_smallest() can grab it.
> + *
> + * The use of signed ints for order and current_order is a deliberate
> + * deviation from the rest of this file, to make the for loop
> + * condition simpler.
>   */
>  static inline bool
> -__rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, int start_migratetype)
> +__rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, int order, int start_migratetype)
>  {
>  	struct free_area *area;
> -	unsigned int current_order;
> +	int current_order;
>  	struct page *page;
>  	int fallback_mt;
>  	bool can_steal;
>  
>  	/* Find the largest possible block of pages in the other list */
>  	for (current_order = MAX_ORDER-1;
> -				current_order >= order && current_order <= MAX_ORDER-1;
> +				current_order >= order;
>  				--current_order) {
>  		area = &(zone->free_area[current_order]);
>  		fallback_mt = find_suitable_fallback(area, current_order,
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] mm: remove a redundant condition in the for loop Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-06-21 11:50 +0200
  [PATCH] mm/page_alloc.c: eliminate unsigned confusion in __rmqueue_fallback Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> - 2017-06-21 21:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc.c: eliminate unsigned confusion in  __rmqueue_fallback Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-06-23 14:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc.c: eliminate unsigned confusion in  __rmqueue_fallback Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-06-23 15:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc.c: eliminate unsigned confusion in  __rmqueue_fallback Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2017-06-24 15:30 +0200

csiph-web