Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1673031
| From | Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH-cgroup 4/6] cgroup: Introduce subtree root mode |
| Date | 2017-06-22 22:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tVgTL-15s-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tSi5J-6MW-65@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSifq-6QJ-81@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUVvX-3sm-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Red Hat |
On 06/21/2017 05:38 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Waiman. > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:05:35AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> Subtree root mode is a new cgroup mode which applies the following >> restrictions when turned on: >> >> 1) Controllers are only allowed to be passed to the children in >> bypass mode except those with the "enable_on_root" flag on. >> 2) Only 1 child cgroup is allowed. >> >> That lone child can be used as the pseudo root of a container cgroup >> hierarchy. All the resources, if controlled, are in the parent >> cgroup. There will be no control knobs in the child. That makes it >> look and feel like a root. > I'm not sure not having the control files in the child makes that much > difference. It is more a look and feel thing than being useful. The sole purpose is to make the container root looks like a real root as much as possible. >> That pseudo root is also considered to be mixable and so can become >> root of a mixed threaded subtree. The no internal process constraint >> also does not apply. > Heh, you can't just declare a non-root cgroup to be a mixed root but > if you're special casing this and making the kernel play a masquerade > with special node, you can make cgroup provide a mixed root while > hosting the internal processes in a dedicated leaf cgroup which isn't > visible to the nested root, right? That is true. > It's all a game of masquerading tho and doesn't actually enable > anything which isn't possible now. This would definitely be useful > for testing. You are right about that. As mentioned in another email, having bypass mode in subtree_control is useful, I think. The concept of subtree root mode, however, is more toward satisfying PeterZ's idea of container invariant. I won't mind leaving it out if others have no objection to that. Cheers, Longman
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH-cgroup 4/6] cgroup: Introduce subtree root mode Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-06-21 23:40 +0200 Re: [RFC PATCH-cgroup 4/6] cgroup: Introduce subtree root mode Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> - 2017-06-22 22:30 +0200
csiph-web