Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1672806
| From | Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] fs/dcache.c: fix spin lockup issue on nlru->lock |
| Date | 2017-06-22 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tVdjb-7eo-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tUhyy-2Le-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUHt0-2vO-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUQPE-6J-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 6/21/2017 10:01 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>
>> index cddf397..c8ca150 100644
>> --- a/fs/dcache.c
>> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
>> @@ -1133,10 +1133,11 @@ void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>> LIST_HEAD(dispose);
>>
>> freed = list_lru_walk(&sb->s_dentry_lru,
>> - dentry_lru_isolate_shrink, &dispose, UINT_MAX);
>> + dentry_lru_isolate_shrink, &dispose, 1024);
>>
>> this_cpu_sub(nr_dentry_unused, freed);
>> shrink_dentry_list(&dispose);
>> + cond_resched();
>> } while (freed > 0);
> In an extreme case, a single invocation of list_lru_walk() can skip all
> 1024 dentries, in which case 'freed' will be 0 forcing us to break the
> loop prematurely. I think we should loop until there's at least one
> dentry left on the LRU, i.e.
>
> while (list_lru_count(&sb->s_dentry_lru) > 0)
>
> However, even that wouldn't be quite correct, because list_lru_count()
> iterates over all memory cgroups to sum list_lru_one->nr_items, which
> can race with memcg offlining code migrating dentries off a dead cgroup
> (see memcg_drain_all_list_lrus()). So it looks like to make this check
> race-free, we need to account the number of entries on the LRU not only
> per memcg, but also per node, i.e. add list_lru_node->nr_items.
> Fortunately, list_lru entries can't be migrated between NUMA nodes.
It looks like list_lru_count() is iterating per node before iterating
over all memory
cgroups as below -
unsigned long list_lru_count_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid)
{
long count = 0;
int memcg_idx;
count += __list_lru_count_one(lru, nid, -1);
if (list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) {
for_each_memcg_cache_index(memcg_idx)
count += __list_lru_count_one(lru, nid, memcg_idx);
}
return count;
}
The first call to __list_lru_count_one() is iterating all the items per
node i.e, nlru->lru->nr_items.
Is my understanding correct? If not, could you please clarify on how to
get the lru items per node?
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] mm/list_lru.c: use cond_resched_lock() for nlru->lock Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> - 2017-06-20 05:00 +0200
[PATCH v2] fs/dcache.c: fix spin lockup issue on nlru->lock Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> - 2017-06-21 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] fs/dcache.c: fix spin lockup issue on nlru->lock Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] fs/dcache.c: fix spin lockup issue on nlru->lock Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> - 2017-06-22 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] fs/dcache.c: fix spin lockup issue on nlru->lock Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 19:50 +0200
[PATCH v3 1/2] mm/list_lru.c: fix list_lru_count_node() to be race free Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> - 2017-06-28 08:10 +0200
[PATCH v3 2/2] fs/dcache.c: fix spin lockup issue on nlru->lock Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> - 2017-06-28 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/list_lru.c: fix list_lru_count_node() to be race free Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 20:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 1/2] mm/list_lru.c: fix list_lru_count_node() to be race free Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> - 2017-06-29 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/list_lru.c: fix list_lru_count_node() to be race free Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 18:30 +0200
[PATCH v4 2/2] fs/dcache.c: fix spin lockup issue on nlru->lock Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> - 2017-06-29 05:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] fs/dcache.c: fix spin lockup issue on nlru->lock Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-30 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] fs/dcache.c: fix spin lockup issue on nlru->lock Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> - 2017-06-30 05:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] fs/dcache.c: fix spin lockup issue on nlru->lock Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 18:30 +0200
csiph-web