Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1673917
| From | Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc robust against y2038/2106 bug |
| Date | 2017-06-24 00:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tVF5L-7VP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tU1k6-S2-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tVCKC-6lJ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 23/06/2017 at 13:40:41 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 06/19/2017 03:36 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > > On 32bits platforms "struct timeval" or "time_t" are using u32 to code the > > date, this cause tools like "date" or "hwclock" failed even before setting > > the RTC device if the date is superior to year 2038 (or 2106). > > > > To avoid this problem I add one RTC test file which directly use RTC ioctl > > to set and read RTC time and alarm values. > > rtctest_setdate allow to set any date/time given in the command line. > > > > On this version 2 I add check of problematics years in rtctest like suggest > > by Alexandre. > > > > Finally that had allowed me to test and fix rtc-st-lpc driver. > > > > Benjamin Gaignard (3): > > tools: timer: add rtctest_setdate > > tool: timer: rtctest add check for problematic dates > > rtc: st-lpc: make it robust against y2038/2106 bug > > > > drivers/rtc/rtc-st-lpc.c | 19 ++-- > > tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile | 2 +- > > tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++- > > tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c > > > > Hi Thomas/John, > > I can take the first two patches in this series through linux-kselftest > with your or John's Ack. Please review and let me know one way or the > other. > Well, I'm the maintainer for rtctest.c and I'll make sure to also be the one for rtctest_setdate.c. > The third one is a rtc driver patch. Please let me know how do you want > to handle this series soon we can get this into 4.13-rc1. > I'll take the three patches but I still have comment I didn't have time to give yet. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc robust against y2038/2106 bug Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> - 2017-06-23 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc robust against y2038/2106 bug Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2017-06-24 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc robust against y2038/2106 bug Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> - 2017-06-24 00:40 +0200
csiph-web