Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1672302
| From | Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c |
| Date | 2017-06-22 06:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tV1UK-803-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tUDIK-9t-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUDSp-cS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUSy6-1pG-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUTDQ-2a7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 06/21, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Hugh, Michal - I also merged Helge's drop-up cleanup, is there > > anything I've missed? I think Oleg had something, but I can't recall > > right now, and I might just have missed it. > > Well, I meant, perhaps we need a bit more changes to ensure that a new > GROWSDOWN vma can't come without a gap below. But this is really minor, > we can do this later even if I am right. I'm mortified. At last I understand you, and see that you spelt it out perfectly clearly in your "unmapped_gap" mail earlier in another thread, when I was in a rush to prioritize what bugs needed looking at first, and brusquely persuaded you to say that this is only a minor defect. Well, yes, it's not a new vulnerability and it's not a new regression, and the users of MAP_GROWSDOWN are few and far between, and often the assignment of holes will work out just fine; but it's an embarrassing oversight on my part, that everything was geared to inflating the size of the existing VM_GROWS vmas, completely forgetting to inflate the size of the area to be added. Without reading you thoroughly (and all the fault mine not yours), I had thought you were referring to the way that a MAP_GROWSDOWN area may be assigned a place in which the stack_guard_gap would immediately prevent it from growing down afterwards (and I'm not sure what to do about that). But your point is that it may be assigned a place in which there is not even a stack_guard_gap below it. (And so the bug that trinity found would not even depend upon MAP_FIXED.) I'll go back to read you again and think on the best way to correct that, I hope it won't need lots of plumbing through different levels. Hugh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2017-06-21 04:50 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-21 20:30 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-21 21:40 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-06-21 22:30 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-21 22:40 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-06-21 23:00 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-22 00:20 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2017-06-22 03:10 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-06-22 17:20 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2017-06-22 20:10 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-06-22 23:00 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-06-21 21:40 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2017-06-22 06:30 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 1be7107fbe: kernel_BUG_at_mm/mmap.c Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2017-06-21 21:50 +0200
csiph-web