Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained

From	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
Date	2017-06-20 11:30 +0200
Message-ID	<tUnDX-6Ll-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tKpxo-AI-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tLfvX-1kn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tLhep-2se-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tLjSW-490-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tU7zc-4Y3-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Borislav Petkov wrote:

> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 09:33:10AM +0000, Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> > 
> > Thanks  for the prompt reply. Agree on points.
> > 
> > we will validate at our end and shall provide the update.
> 
> Any news on the issue? Resolution?
> 
> I still have a user reporting "irq 7: nobody cared (try booting with the
> "irqpoll" option)" pointing to amd_gpio_irq_handler(), even with Thomas'
> patch.
> 
> See https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034261
> 
> So something's still not completely fine yet.

Well, that's kinda expected.

If the interrupt _IS_ screaming because the hardware is buggered, then the
nobody cared thing will detect it and switch it off. That's all what we can
do, aside of not loading the driver at all.

But that's way better than silently locking up the box forever.

Thanks

	tglx

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-06-20 11:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-06-20 11:40 +0200

csiph-web