Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1670011
| From | Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: iproc: Retry request when CRS returned from EP |
| Date | 2017-06-20 00:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tUduV-dR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tR2ml-ja-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tR2ml-ja-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRH69-kl-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRLCN-3h8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:58:22AM +0530, Oza Oza wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote: > > Please wrap your changelogs to use 75 columns. "git log" indents the > > changelog by four spaces, so if your text is 75 wide, it will still > > fit without wrapping. > > > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 09:35:37AM +0530, Oza Pawandeep wrote: > >> For Configuration Requests only, following reset > >> it is possible for a device to terminate the request > >> but indicate that it is temporarily unable to process > >> the Request, but will be able to process the Request > >> in the future – in this case, the Configuration Request > >> Retry Status 10 (CRS) Completion Status is used > > > > How does this relate to the CRS support we already have in the core, > > e.g., pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id()? It looks like your root complex > > already returns 0xffff0001 (CFG_RETRY_STATUS) in some cases. > > > > Also, per spec (PCIe r3.1, sec 2.3.2), CRS Software Visibility only > > affects config reads of the Vendor ID, but you call > > iproc_pcie_cfg_retry() for all config offsets. > > Yes, as per Spec, CRS Software Visibility only affects config read of > the Vendor ID. > For config write or any other config read the Root must automatically > re-issue configuration > request again as a new request, and our PCIe RC fails to do so. OK, if this is a workaround for a hardware defect, let's make that explicit in the changelog (and probably a comment in the code, too). I'm actually not sure the spec *requires* the CRS retries to be done directly in hardware, so it's conceivable the hardware could be working as designed. But a comment would go a long way toward making this understandable by differentiating it from the generic CRS handling in the core. Bjorn
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3 0/2] PCI: iproc: SOC specific fixes Oza Pawandeep <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-06-11 06:10 +0200
[PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: iproc: Retry request when CRS returned from EP Oza Pawandeep <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-06-11 06:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: iproc: Retry request when CRS returned from EP Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-06-13 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: iproc: Retry request when CRS returned from EP Oza Oza <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-06-13 06:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: iproc: Retry request when CRS returned from EP Oza Oza <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-06-13 07:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: iproc: Retry request when CRS returned from EP Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-06-20 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: iproc: Retry request when CRS returned from EP Oza Oza <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-06-20 14:50 +0200
[PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: iproc: add device shutdown for PCI RC Oza Pawandeep <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-06-11 06:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: iproc: add device shutdown for PCI RC Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-06-13 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: iproc: add device shutdown for PCI RC Oza Oza <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-06-14 07:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: iproc: add device shutdown for PCI RC Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-06-15 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: iproc: add device shutdown for PCI RC Oza Oza <oza.oza@broadcom.com> - 2017-06-21 10:10 +0200
csiph-web