Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1671724
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] |
| Date | 2017-06-21 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tUOXw-7i3-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tNvwB-1jB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUJ1N-3E2-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUNf4-682-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUOE9-78N-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Em Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 04:19:11PM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu: > On Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 14:48:29 CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu: > > > On Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 03:07:39 CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > Hi Millian, can I take this as an Acked-by or Tested-by? > > > > > > I have no access to any PowerPC hardware. In principle the code looks > > > fine, but that's all I can say here. > > > > Ok, that would count as an Acked-by, i.e. from > > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst: > > > > ------------------------- > > > > Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker > > has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance. Hence patch > > mergers will sometimes manually convert an acker's "yep, looks good to me" > > into an Acked-by: (but note that it is usually better to ask for an > > explicit ack). > > > > ------------------------- > > > > If you had a ppc machine _and_ had applied and tested the patch, that > > would allow us to use a Tested-by tag. > > I see, I'm still unfamiliar with this process. But yes, do consider it an > `Acked-by` from my side then. Right, then there is another tag there that is relevant to this discussion: Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1496312681-20133-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com which will has the Message-ID of the message with this patch, embedded in a URL that when clicked will bring you to the thread where the patch was submitted and the acks, tested-by, reviewed-by, etc were provided, so that we can go back and check the history of the patch. - Arnaldo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-06-21 03:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> - 2017-06-21 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-06-21 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> - 2017-06-21 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-06-21 16:40 +0200
csiph-web