linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

From	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Date	2017-06-21 03:50 +0200
Message-ID	<tUCWl-7XY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  net/core/rtnetlink.c

between commit:

  db833d40ad32 ("rtnetlink: add IFLA_GROUP to ifla_policy")

from the net tree and commit:

  3d3ea5af5c0b ("rtnl: Add support for netdev event to link messages")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 467a2f4510a7,3aa57848a895..000000000000
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@@ -1469,7 -1519,7 +1520,8 @@@ static const struct nla_policy ifla_pol
  	[IFLA_LINK_NETNSID]	= { .type = NLA_S32 },
  	[IFLA_PROTO_DOWN]	= { .type = NLA_U8 },
  	[IFLA_XDP]		= { .type = NLA_NESTED },
 +	[IFLA_GROUP]		= { .type = NLA_U32 },
+ 	[IFLA_EVENT]		= { .type = NLA_U32 },
  };
  
  static const struct nla_policy ifla_info_policy[IFLA_INFO_MAX+1] = {

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-21 03:50 +0200

csiph-web