Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1671250

Re: [RFC v2 10/12] powerpc: Read AMR only if pkey-violation caused the exception.

From Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC v2 10/12] powerpc: Read AMR only if pkey-violation caused the exception.
Date 2017-06-21 02:00 +0200
Message-ID <tUBdU-6Oo-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tTd3X-1kp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tTd3Y-1kp-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tU2Jc-1RM-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tU97Y-5OJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUl98-55H-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:16:40PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 06/19/2017 11:29 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:06:13PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S | 16 ++++++++++------
> >>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
> >>> index 8db9ef8..a4de1b4 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
> >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
> >>> @@ -493,13 +493,15 @@ EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(data_access_common)
> >>>  	ld	r12,_MSR(r1)
> >>>  	ld	r3,PACA_EXGEN+EX_DAR(r13)
> >>>  	lwz	r4,PACA_EXGEN+EX_DSISR(r13)
> >>> +	std	r3,_DAR(r1)
> >>> +	std	r4,_DSISR(r1)
> >>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> >>> +	andis.  r0,r4,DSISR_KEYFAULT@h /* save AMR only if its a key fault */
> >>> +	beq+	1f
> >>
> >> This seems to be incremental on top of one of your other patches.
> >>
> >> But I don't see why, can you please just squash this into whatever patch
> >> adds this code in the first place.
> > 
> > It was an optimization added later. But yes it can be squashed into an
> > earlier patch.
> 
> Could you please explain what is the optimization this achieves ?

Don't want to read the AMR if it is not a key protection fault. This is a hot-hot-path.
A few cycles saved can accumulate into signficant savings overall.

RP

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC v2 10/12] powerpc: Read AMR only if pkey-violation caused  the exception. Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-06-20 08:50 +0200
  Re: [RFC v2 10/12] powerpc: Read AMR only if pkey-violation caused  the exception. Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-06-21 02:00 +0200

csiph-web