Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1668187
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: endian bitshift defects [ was: staging: fusb302: don't bitshift __le16 type ] |
| Date | 2017-06-17 08:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tTeW7-2ET-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tT3nX-3dR-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tT8dX-6uY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tTet4-2tH-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, 2017-06-17 at 07:23 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 19:45 +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
> > > The header field in struct pd_message is declared as an __le16 type. The
> > > data in the message is supposed to be little endian. This means we don't
> > > have to go and shift the individual bytes into position when we're
> > > filling the buffer, we can just copy the contents right away. As an
> > > added benefit we don't get fishy results on big endian systems anymore.
> >
> > Thanks for pointing this out.
> >
> > There are several instances of this class of error.
> >
> > Here's a cocci script to find them.
> >
> > This is best used with cocci's --all-includes option like:
> >
> > $ spatch --all-includes --very-quiet --sp-file lebe_bitshifts.cocci .
> > [ many defects...]
Probably would have been better as [ many possible defects... ]
> > $ cat lebe_bitshifts.cocci
> > @@
> > typedef __le16, __le32, __le64, __be16, __be32, __be64;
> > { __le16, __le32, __le64, __be16, __be32, __be64 } a;
> > expression b;
> > @@
> >
> > * a << b
[etc...]
> Is this always a problem?
No, not always.
If the CPU is the equivalent endian, the bitshift is fine.
It can't be known if the code is only compiled on a
single cpu type. It is rather odd though to use endian
notation if the code is compiled for a single cpu type.
> Would it be useful to add this to the scripts
> in the kernel?
Maybe.
btw: is there a way for the operators to be surrounded by
some \( \| \) or some other bracket style so it could
be written with a single test?
Something like:
@@
typedef __le16, __le32, __le64, __be16, __be32, __be64;
{ __le16, __le32, __le64, __be16, __be32, __be64 } a;
expression b;
@@
* a [<<|<<=|>>|>>=] b
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] staging: fusb302: don't bitshift __le16 type Frans Klaver <fransklaver@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] staging: fusb302: don't bitshift __le16 type Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-06-16 20:20 +0200
endian bitshift defects [ was: staging: fusb302: don't bitshift __le16 type ] Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-06-17 00:50 +0200
Re: endian bitshift defects [ was: staging: fusb302: don't bitshift __le16 type ] Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2017-06-17 07:30 +0200
Re: endian bitshift defects [ was: staging: fusb302: don't bitshift __le16 type ] Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-06-17 08:00 +0200
Re: endian bitshift defects [ was: staging: fusb302: don't bitshift __le16 type ] Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2017-06-17 08:10 +0200
Re: endian bitshift defects [ was: staging: fusb302: don't bitshift __le16 type ] Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-06-17 08:30 +0200
Re: endian bitshift defects [ was: staging: fusb302: don't bitshift __le16 type ] Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2017-06-17 08:30 +0200
csiph-web