Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1666588

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: gpio-wcove: Fix GPIO control register offset calculation

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:39 AM,
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
>
> According to Whiskey Cove PMIC GPIO controller specification, for GPIO
> pins 0-12, GPIO input and output register control address range from,
>
> 0x4e44-0x4e50 for GPIO outputs control register
>
> 0x4e51-0x4e5d for GPIO input control register
>
> But, currently when calculating the GPIO register offsets in to_reg()
> function, all GPIO pins in the same bank uses the same GPIO control
> register address. This logic is incorrect. This patch fixes this
> issue.
>
> This patch also adds support to selectively skip register modification
> for virtual GPIOs.
>
> In case of Whiskey Cove PMIC, ACPI code may use up 94 virtual GPIOs.
> These virtual GPIOs are used by the ACPI code as means to access various
> non GPIO bits of PMIC. So for these virtual GPIOs, we don't need to
> manipulate the physical GPIO pin register. A similar patch has been
> merged recently by Hans for Crystal Cove PMIC GPIO driver. You can
> find more details about it in Commit 9a752b4c9ab9 ("gpio: crystalcove:
> Do not write regular gpio registers for virtual GPIOs")
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> Reported-by: Jukka Laitinen <jukka.laitinen@intel.com>

It seems it should have a Fixes tag.

>  static inline unsigned int to_reg(int gpio, enum ctrl_register reg_type)
>  {
>         unsigned int reg;
> -       int bank;
>
> -       if (gpio < BANK0_NR_PINS)
> -               bank = 0;
> -       else if (gpio < BANK0_NR_PINS + BANK1_NR_PINS)
> -               bank = 1;
> -       else
> -               bank = 2;

> +       if (gpio >= WCOVE_GPIO_NUM)
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;

How this can happen?

>
>         if (reg_type == CTRL_IN)
> -               reg = GPIO_IN_CTRL_BASE + bank;

> +               /*
> +                * GPIO input control registers
> +                * (one per pin): 0x4e51 - 0x4e5d
> +                */

Noise.

> +               reg = GPIO_IN_CTRL_BASE + gpio;
>         else
> -               reg = GPIO_OUT_CTRL_BASE + bank;

> +               /* GPIO output control registers
> +                * (one per pin): 0x4e44 - 0x4e50
> +                */

Wrong multi-line comment and noise overall.

If you wish to leave the comments, put them on top of the function as
its description.

> +               reg = GPIO_OUT_CTRL_BASE + gpio;
>
>         return reg;
>  }
> @@ -145,7 +147,10 @@ static void wcove_update_irq_mask(struct wcove_gpio *wg, int gpio)
>
>  static void wcove_update_irq_ctrl(struct wcove_gpio *wg, int gpio)
>  {
> -       unsigned int reg = to_reg(gpio, CTRL_IN);

> +       int reg = to_reg(gpio, CTRL_IN);
> +
> +       if (reg < 0)
> +               return;

Since above comment this change would gone.

> +       int reg = to_reg(gpio, CTRL_OUT);
> +
> +       if (reg < 0)
> +               return 0;
>
> -       return regmap_write(wg->regmap, to_reg(gpio, CTRL_OUT),
> -                           CTLO_INPUT_SET);
> +       return regmap_write(wg->regmap, reg, CTLO_INPUT_SET);

Ditto.

> +       int reg = to_reg(gpio, CTRL_OUT);
>
> -       return regmap_write(wg->regmap, to_reg(gpio, CTRL_OUT),
> -                           CTLO_OUTPUT_SET | value);
> +       if (reg < 0)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       return regmap_write(wg->regmap, reg, CTLO_OUTPUT_SET | value);

Ditto.

> +       int ret, reg = to_reg(gpio, CTRL_OUT);

Don't fit such variable on one line.

> +
> +       if (reg < 0)
> +               return 0;
>
> -       ret = regmap_read(wg->regmap, to_reg(gpio, CTRL_OUT), &val);
> +       ret = regmap_read(wg->regmap, reg, &val);

This would gone after addressing first comment.

> -       int ret;
> +       int ret, reg = to_reg(gpio, CTRL_IN);
> +
> +       if (reg < 0)
> +               return 0;
>
> -       ret = regmap_read(wg->regmap, to_reg(gpio, CTRL_IN), &val);
> +       ret = regmap_read(wg->regmap, reg, &val);

Ditto.

> +       int reg = to_reg(gpio, CTRL_OUT);
> +
> +       if (reg < 0)
> +               return;
>
>         if (value)
> -               regmap_update_bits(wg->regmap, to_reg(gpio, CTRL_OUT), 1, 1);
> +               regmap_update_bits(wg->regmap, reg, 1, 1);
>         else
> -               regmap_update_bits(wg->regmap, to_reg(gpio, CTRL_OUT), 1, 0);
> +               regmap_update_bits(wg->regmap, reg, 1, 0);

Ditto.

> +       int reg = to_reg(gpio, CTRL_OUT);
> +
> +       if (reg < 0)
> +               return 0;
>
>         switch (pinconf_to_config_param(config)) {
>         case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
> -               return regmap_update_bits(wg->regmap, to_reg(gpio, CTRL_OUT),
> -                                               CTLO_DRV_MASK, CTLO_DRV_OD);
> +               return regmap_update_bits(wg->regmap, reg, CTLO_DRV_MASK,
> +                                         CTLO_DRV_OD);
>         case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
> -               return regmap_update_bits(wg->regmap, to_reg(gpio, CTRL_OUT),
> -                                               CTLO_DRV_MASK, CTLO_DRV_CMOS);
> +               return regmap_update_bits(wg->regmap, reg, CTLO_DRV_MASK,
> +                                         CTLO_DRV_CMOS);

Ditto.

> +       if (data->hwirq >= WCOVE_GPIO_NUM)
> +               return 0;
> +

How could it happen?

> +       if (data->hwirq >= WCOVE_GPIO_NUM)
> +               return;

Ditto.

> +       if (data->hwirq >= WCOVE_GPIO_NUM)
> +               return;

Ditto.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: gpio-wcove: Fix GPIO control register offset calculation sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com - 2017-06-14 23:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: gpio-wcove: Fix GPIO control register offset calculation Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 11:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: gpio-wcove: Fix GPIO control register offset  calculation sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy          <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> - 2017-06-15 23:00 +0200

csiph-web