Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1666304
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB mode and TLB freshness tracking |
| Date | 2017-06-15 00:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tSpgR-2GV-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tS8zn-C4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tS8zn-C4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSp7b-2DF-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
> On 06/13/2017 09:56 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> - if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask))
>> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask)) {
>> + local_irq_disable();
>> flush_tlb_func_local(&info, TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN);
>> + local_irq_enable();
>> + }
>> +
>
> Could you talk a little about why this needs to be local_irq_disable()
> and not preempt_disable()? Is it about the case where somebody is
> trying to call flush_tlb_func_*() from an interrupt handler?
It's to prevent flush_tlb_func_local() and flush_tlb_func_remote()
from being run concurrently, which would cause flush_tlb_func_common()
to be reentered. Either we'd need to be very careful in
flush_tlb_func_common() to avoid races if this happened, or we could
just disable interrupts around flush_tlb_func_local(). The latter is
fast and easy.
--Andy
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 05/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB mode and TLB freshness tracking Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-06-14 07:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB mode and TLB freshness tracking Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2017-06-14 08:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB mode and TLB freshness tracking Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-06-20 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB mode and TLB freshness tracking Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2017-06-15 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB mode and TLB freshness tracking Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-06-15 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB mode and TLB freshness tracking Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB mode and TLB freshness tracking Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-06-20 00:00 +0200
csiph-web