Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1666139

Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: Move paravirt IOPL switching to slow the path

From Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: Move paravirt IOPL switching to slow the path
Date 2017-06-14 20:30 +0200
Message-ID <tSldg-cr-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tSfUd-5dU-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSfUd-5dU-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSkAx-8cx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSkTT-64-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Andrew Cooper
<andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 14/06/17 18:40, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Since tasks using IOPL are very rare, move the switching code to the slow
>>> path for lower impact on normal tasks.
>> I think that Andrew Cooper added a vmassist that we could opt in to
>> that makes Xen PV IOPL switching work more or less just like native.
>> We could maybe opt in to that and avoid needing this stuff at all on
>> newer hypervisors.
>
> Indeed.
>
> HYPERVISOR_vm_assist(VMASST_CMD_enable, VMASST_TYPE_architectural_iopl);
>
> (if recognised) does two things.
>
> 1) virtual IOPL is picked up from EFLAGS in the iret frame, exactly like
> native.
> 2) The guest kernel is assumed to have virtual CPL0 for the purpose of
> privilege calculations.
>
> Xen never runs with the real IOPL different to 0, or a PV guests could
> disable interrupts with popf.  As a result, all IO port access does trap
> to Xen for auditing.  What part 2) does is avoid having the awkward
> double-step of Linux needing to set IOPL to 1 for kernel level IO access
> to avoid faulting.
>
> The assist should be available in Xen 4.7 and later (or wherever vendors
> have backported it to).
>
> ~Andrew

Ok.  So do we keep the old code around to support older Xen
hypervisors or just require the newer Xen for guest userspace IOPL
support?  Part of the reason I am making these changes is to sync the
32-bit and 64-bit code in __switch_to(), to ultimately merge them.

--
Brian Gerst

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: Move paravirt IOPL switching to slow the path Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 14:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: Move paravirt IOPL switching to slow the  path Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2017-06-14 15:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: Move paravirt IOPL switching to slow the path Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 19:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: Move paravirt IOPL switching to slow the  path Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2017-06-14 19:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: Move paravirt IOPL switching to slow the path Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-06-14 19:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: Move paravirt IOPL switching to slow the  path Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> - 2017-06-14 20:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: Move paravirt IOPL switching to slow the path Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 20:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: Move paravirt IOPL switching to slow the path Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-06-15 03:40 +0200

csiph-web