Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1667616
| From | Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations |
| Date | 2017-06-16 12:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tSWFQ-7co-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tSy0N-8r5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSy0O-8r5-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSEpA-3Kz-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSFvk-4D9-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSJIC-7cs-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi, > I'm not sure I agree regarding the vgpu statement, maybe this is not > dmabuf specific, but what makes it vgpu specific? We need to > separate > our current usage plans from what it's actually describing and I > don't > see that it describes anything vgpu specific. Well, it describes a framebuffer, what non-graphic device would need that? cheers, Gerd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v9 0/7] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-06-15 10:10 +0200
[PATCH v9 6/7] drm/i915/gvt: Dmabuf support for GVT-g Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-06-15 10:10 +0200
[PATCH v9 4/7] drm/i915/gvt: Frame buffer decoder support for GVT-g Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-06-15 10:10 +0200
[PATCH v9 3/7] drm: Extend the drm format Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-06-15 10:10 +0200
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 3/7] drm: Extend the drm format Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> - 2017-06-15 12:30 +0200
[PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-06-15 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> - 2017-06-15 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-06-15 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-06-15 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-06-16 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-06-16 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> - 2017-06-16 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-06-16 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> - 2017-06-16 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-06-19 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-06-19 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-06-19 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-06-19 17:00 +0200
csiph-web