Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1666737

Re: udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount

From Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount
Date 2017-06-15 15:50 +0200
Message-ID <tSDjP-36J-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tRErE-74t-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRTK2-8oY-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSmj0-Qa-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSytQ-8X-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thursday 15 June 2017 10:34:27 Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 14-06-17 21:36:45, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 June 2017 14:59:55 Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Mon 12-06-17 22:40:14, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree:
> > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/
> > > > 
> > > > It is really a good improvement to recognize UDF file system which
> > > > have block size different from disk sector size and also different
> > > > from 2048.
> > > > 
> > > > But should not detection on 4K native disks (4096/4096) try to also
> > > > use block size of 512 bytes? Because current loop is from logical
> > > > sector size to 4096.
> > > 
> > > By definition, bdev_logical_block_size() is the smallest block size a
> > > device can support. So if it is larger than 512, the device driver
> > > had explicitely declared that it cannot handle smaller blocks...
> > 
> > Ok, but it is a really problem when trying to read data from filesystem 
> > which has smaller blocks as the smallest block size of a device?
> > 
> > In the worst case filesystem driver needs to read 512 bytes, but device 
> > can send only block of 4096 bytes (as it does not support smaller 
> > block). Driver receives 4096 bytes, then it process just first 512 bytes 
> > and do not care about remaining data...
> 
> Well, as much as I agree this is possible in principle, the block layer,
> block device page cache etc. don't handle this so it would be a non-trivial
> effort to support this.

Ok, so it is not a problem in UDF driver nor hardware, just it is
limitation of kernel block layer which do not support it.

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2017-06-12 22:50 +0200
  Re: udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2017-06-13 15:10 +0200
    Re: udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 21:40 +0200
      Re: udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2017-06-15 10:40 +0200
        Re: udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:50 +0200

csiph-web