Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1666668
| From | Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] |
| Date | 2017-06-15 13:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tSAYG-1Mg-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tNvwB-1jB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRSEh-7vV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRWox-1oA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSyDw-cv-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 10:46 +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> Just a quick question: Have you guys applied my recent patch:
>
> commit 5ea0416f51cc93436bbe497c62ab49fd9cb245b6
> Author: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
> Date: Thu Jun 1 23:00:21 2017 +0200
>
> perf report: Include partial stacks unwound with libdw
>
> So far the whole stack was thrown away when any error occurred before
> the maximum stack depth was unwound. This is actually a very common
> scenario though. The stacks that got unwound so far are still
> interesting. This removes a large chunk of differences when comparing
> perf script output for libunwind and libdw perf unwinding.
>
> If not, then this could explain the issue you are seeing.
Thanks! No, I didn't have that patch (*) yet. It makes a huge
difference. With that, Paolo's patch and the elfutils libdw powerpc64
fallback unwinder patch, it looks like I get user stack traces for
everything now on ppc64le.
Cheers,
Mark
(*) It just this one-liner, but what a difference that makes:
--- a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int unwind__get_entries(unwind_entry_cb_t cb, void *arg,
err = dwfl_getthread_frames(ui->dwfl, thread->tid, frame_callback, ui);
- if (err && !ui->max_stack)
+ if (err && ui->max_stack != max_stack)
err = 0;
/*
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-06-09 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-06-12 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> - 2017-06-13 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-06-13 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> - 2017-06-15 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> - 2017-06-15 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-06-16 06:30 +0200
csiph-web