Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes

From	Richard Narron <comet.berkeley@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes
Date	2017-06-14 00:00 +0200
Message-ID	<tS20V-4RM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <tQSZH-2hW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRh22-Dj-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRqRI-6Wp-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRIlz-10C-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRJ7Y-1wv-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, Al Viro wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 05:54:06PM -0700, Richard Narron wrote:
>
>> Earlier today I could not reproduce the OpenBSD 6.1 ufs1 fsck error after
>> Linux 4.12-rc5 copy of my >2GB file using "cp".
>>
>> But later today I get the error when I copy using your "dd" method...
>>
>> In any case I always get a ufs1 fsck error after the Linux rm and rmdir.
>
> Interesting...  Could you put together an image (starting with zeroing the
> device before newfs, and ideally with dd from /dev/zero to create files)
> that would
> 	a) pass fsck on OpenBSD
> 	b) after rm on Linux fail the same
> then convert it to qcow2 and publish?  Or just compress it - all free and
> data blocks would contain only zeroes, so any kind of compression (gzip,
> bzip2, whatever) would reduce the size to something more managable...

I created a gzip and sent you an email with the link to a UFS1 OpenBSD 
filesytem image.

I finished simple testing of UFS1 with FreeBSD and NetBSD and found no 
problems except for the differences between "available" blocks in df 
commands.

And testing UFS2 was fine with all 3 systems, FreeBSD, OpenBSD and 
NetBSD.

Thread

[git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-06-09 23:40 +0200
  Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Richard Narron <comet.berkeley@gmail.com> - 2017-06-10 15:10 +0200
    Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-06-10 18:10 +0200
      Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-06-10 20:10 +0200
        Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-10 20:20 +0200
        Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Richard Narron <comet.berkeley@gmail.com> - 2017-06-11 21:50 +0200
          Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-06-11 23:40 +0200
          Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-06-12 08:20 +0200
            Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Richard Narron <comet.berkeley@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 03:00 +0200
              Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-06-13 03:50 +0200
                Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Richard Narron <comet.berkeley@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 00:00 +0200
                Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-06-14 09:20 +0200
                Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Richard Narron <comet.berkeley@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 22:40 +0200
                Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-06-15 10:10 +0200
                Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Richard Narron <comet.berkeley@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 16:30 +0200
                Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-06-17 04:20 +0200
                Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-06-18 03:20 +0200
                Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Richard Narron <comet.berkeley@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 22:50 +0200

csiph-web