Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1664812

Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Kconfig: Fix the missing hi655x common clk

From Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Kconfig: Fix the missing hi655x common clk
Date 2017-06-13 14:50 +0200
Message-ID <tRTqH-81T-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <tQyoh-61J-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tQyxX-64T-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tQz0Z-6e3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRtZg-lF-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tREUG-7tr-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/06/2017 23:12, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 10:48:13PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 10:15 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Daniel Lezcano
>>>>> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, but I'm not sure this is the right patch either. We tend to not
>>>>> use 'select' for user-visible drivers, and most hisilicon platforms
>>>>> won't need this driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it would be more consistent to add this to the defconfig
>>>>> and regard it as a user error when the driver is disabled on a
>>>>> machine that needs it.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the select is not exactly in the right place, but I don't really
>>>> feel like a pmic on an SoC is a "user-visible driver". I deal with the
>>>> board often and when the new dependency was made on the clk, I would
>>>> have never have found it on my own w/o Ulf and Daniel pointing out
>>>> what I needed to enable.
>>>
>>> What I meant is that the Kconfig option is user-visible. On a very high
>>> level, this is a result of arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms listing only
>>> very broad categories of SoCs, in many cases only the manufacturers
>>> of very different chip families, which then control the visibility of the
>>> individual Kconfig items for things like pinctrl or clk.
>>>
>>> I now see that MFD_HI655X_PMIC is the top-level driver that you
>>> have to select before enabling COMMON_CLK_HI655X, so the
>>> patch is actually broken unless it actually selects both.
>>>
>>> How about simply adding a 'default MFD_HI655X_PMIC' to
>>> COMMON_CLK_HI655X to enable it unless it is explicitly
>>> turned off?
>>
>> Actually, I share John's opinion.
>>
>> Ideally when we choose a platform, all the relevants devices configuration
>> options should be selected automatically from a single topmost node of a tree
>> (platform selection) to all the nodes corresponding to the devices, leaving the
>> user to select one simple option without knowledge of the SoC hardware
>> internals.
>>
>> If the user is expert in the platform and knows exactly what he does, then he
>> can select an _EXPERT_ like option and be able to disable some drivers.
>>
>> It is how I tend to write the Kconfig options, so the 'default MFD_HI655X_PMIC'
>> is confusing for me. Wouldn't make sense to select COMMON_CLK_HI655X when
>> MFD_HI655X_PMIC is enabled?
> 
> I don't think it's that easy. When you do that, MFD_HI655X_PMIC gains
> a dependency on COMMON_CLK and will again cause a warning on
> machines that disable that during compile testing.

This issue is related to the missing stubs in the includes.

> Using 'select' for user-selectable options generally leads to problems,
> and you are better off avoiding it. If you want to make the symbol impossible
> to turn off for non-EXPERT configurations, you can write it like
> 
> config COMMON_CLK_HI655X
>         tristate "Clock driver for Hi655x" if EXPERT
>         depends on (MFD_HI655X_PMIC || COMPILE_TEST)
>         depends on REGMAP
>         default MFD_HI655X_PMIC
> 
> That way the option is completely hidden for non-EXPERT,
> but still has the right default otherwise, and the dependencies
> are tracked right for compile-testing.

Ok.

Thanks!

  -- Daniel


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Kconfig: Fix the missing hi655x common clk Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2017-06-09 17:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Kconfig: Fix the missing hi655x common clk Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-06-09 22:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Kconfig: Fix the missing hi655x common clk John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2017-06-09 22:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Kconfig: Fix the missing hi655x common clk Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-06-09 22:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Kconfig: Fix the missing hi655x common clk Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2017-06-12 11:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Kconfig: Fix the missing hi655x common clk Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-06-12 23:20 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Kconfig: Fix the missing hi655x common clk Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2017-06-13 14:50 +0200

csiph-web