Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1664688

Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl, avoid undefined behaviour

From zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl, avoid undefined behaviour
Date 2017-06-13 12:10 +0200
Message-ID <tRQVR-6DL-49@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ss6Yp-7QI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRpLY-6km-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRQj8-6bD-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2017/6/13 17:29, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 06/12/2017, 07:03 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
>> On 2016/10/14 17:23, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> fcntl(0, F_SETOWN, 0x80000000) triggers:
>>> UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/fcntl.c:118:7
>>> negation of -2147483648 cannot be represented in type 'int':
>>> CPU: 1 PID: 18261 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 4.8.1-0-syzkaller #1
>>> ...
>>> Call Trace:
>>> ...
>>>  [<ffffffffad8f0868>] ? f_setown+0x1d8/0x200
>>>  [<ffffffffad8f19a9>] ? SyS_fcntl+0x999/0xf30
>>>  [<ffffffffaed1fb00>] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc1
>>>
>>> Fix that by checking the arg parameter properly (against INT_MAX) and
>>> return immediatelly in case it is wrong. No error is returned, the
>>> same as in other cases.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
>>> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
>>> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
>>> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>>> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
>>> ---
>>>  fs/fcntl.c | 4 ++++
>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c
>>> index 350a2c8cfd28..bfc3b040d956 100644
>>> --- a/fs/fcntl.c
>>> +++ b/fs/fcntl.c
>>> @@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ void f_setown(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg, int force)
>>>  	enum pid_type type;
>>>  	struct pid *pid;
>>>  	int who = arg;
>>> +
>>> +	if (arg > INT_MAX)
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>>  	type = PIDTYPE_PID;
>>>  	if (who < 0
>>>  		type = PIDTYPE_PGID;
>> Hi, Jiri
>>
>> I hit the same issue,  but I see the upstream is still not changed.  Had any problem?
> Hi, it needed an update which I have just sent. So let's see if that
> gets applied.
>
> thanks,
  I have updated in newest kernel version. but it fails to get the change.  Can you look at that?

Thanks
zhongjiang

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl, avoid undefined behaviour zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> - 2017-06-12 07:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl, avoid undefined behaviour Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> - 2017-06-13 11:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl, avoid undefined behaviour zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> - 2017-06-13 12:10 +0200

csiph-web