Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1662791
| From | David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [patch -mm] mm, hugetlb: schedule when potentially allocating many hugepages |
| Date | 2017-06-10 00:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tQAJr-7ia-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tPWVI-7FJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tPXoJ-7V3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Mike Kravetz wrote: > > @@ -2364,6 +2366,7 @@ static unsigned long set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, > > ret = alloc_fresh_gigantic_page(h, nodes_allowed); > > else > > ret = alloc_fresh_huge_page(h, nodes_allowed); > > + cond_resched(); > > Are not the following lines immediately before the above huge page allocation > in set_max_huge_pages, or am I looking at an incorrect version of the file? > > /* yield cpu to avoid soft lockup */ > cond_resched(); Ahh, we don't have this in our tree, thanks for catching it. The other two cond_resched()'s are needed because we have reproduced them, so I'll send a v2.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[patch -mm] mm, hugetlb: schedule when potentially allocating many hugepages David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2017-06-08 06:10 +0200
Re: [patch -mm] mm, hugetlb: schedule when potentially allocating many hugepages Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> - 2017-06-08 06:40 +0200
[patch v2 -mm] mm, hugetlb: schedule when potentially allocating many hugepages David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2017-06-10 00:40 +0200
Re: [patch v2 -mm] mm, hugetlb: schedule when potentially allocating many hugepages Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> - 2017-06-10 00:50 +0200
Re: [patch -mm] mm, hugetlb: schedule when potentially allocating many hugepages David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2017-06-10 00:40 +0200
csiph-web