Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1661159
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/5] rbtree: Cache leftmost node internally |
| Date | 2017-06-08 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tQ5mi-4Gs-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tMEVj-LL-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tMEVj-LL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 07:09:36PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h b/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h
> index 9702b6e183bc..b84ee26c19d9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h
> @@ -41,7 +41,9 @@ struct rb_augment_callbacks {
> void (*rotate)(struct rb_node *old, struct rb_node *new);
> };
>
> -extern void __rb_insert_augmented(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root,
> +extern void __rb_insert_augmented(struct rb_node *node,
> + struct rb_root *root,
> + bool newleft, struct rb_node **leftmost,
> void (*augment_rotate)(struct rb_node *old, struct rb_node *new));
> /*
> * Fixup the rbtree and update the augmented information when rebalancing.
> @@ -150,6 +161,7 @@ extern void __rb_erase_color(struct rb_node *parent, struct rb_root *root,
>
> static __always_inline struct rb_node *
> __rb_erase_augmented(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root,
> + bool cached, struct rb_node **leftmost,
> const struct rb_augment_callbacks *augment)
> {
> struct rb_node *child = node->rb_right;
> @@ -157,6 +169,9 @@ __rb_erase_augmented(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root,
> struct rb_node *parent, *rebalance;
> unsigned long pc;
>
> + if (cached && node == *leftmost)
> + *leftmost = rb_next(node);
> +
> if (!tmp) {
> /*
> * Case 1: node to erase has no more than 1 child (easy!)
Why do we have @cached ? Wouldn't simply testing @leftmost for NULL not
do the same?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/5] rbtree: Cache leftmost node internally Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-06-08 15:10 +0200 Re: [PATCH 1/5] rbtree: Cache leftmost node internally Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2017-06-08 17:40 +0200
csiph-web