Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1661010
| From | Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove SYNC from _switch |
| Date | 2017-06-08 12:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tQ2oq-2Ex-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tPM0j-zo-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <tPTEu-5rT-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tPZAf-Nh-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tQ0cV-1hd-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tQ0wh-1oo-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 05:29:38PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:54:00 +0200 >> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: >> > >> > Right, so this patch relies on the smp_mb__before_spinlock -> >> > smp_mb__after_spinlock conversion that makes the rq->lock RCsc and >> > should thus provide the required SYNC for migrations. >> >> AFAIKS either one will do, so long as there is a hwsync there. The >> point is just that I have added some commentary in the generic and >> powerpc parts to make it clear we're relying on that behavior of >> the primitive. smp_mb* is not guaranteed to order MMIO, it's just >> that it does on powerpc. > > I'm not particularly happy with the generic comment; I don't feel we > should care that PPC is special here. I think it'd be nice if there was *some* comment on the two uses of smp_mb__after_spinlock(), it's fairly subtle, but I don't think it needs to mention PPC specifically. If we have: arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h: +/* + * This must resolve to hwsync on SMP for the context switch path. See + * _switch. + */ #define smp_mb__after_spinlock() smp_mb() And then something in _switch() that says "we rely on the smp_mb__after_spinlock() in the scheduler core being a hwsync", that should probably be sufficient. cheers
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove SYNC from _switch Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-06-07 18:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove SYNC from _switch Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-08 02:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove SYNC from _switch Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-06-08 09:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove SYNC from _switch Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-08 09:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove SYNC from _switch Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-06-08 10:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove SYNC from _switch Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-08 10:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove SYNC from _switch Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-06-08 12:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove SYNC from _switch Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-08 12:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove SYNC from _switch Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-06-08 14:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove SYNC from _switch Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-08 15:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove SYNC from _switch Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-06-08 15:50 +0200
csiph-web