Re: [PATCH 6/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/kernel

From	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 6/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/kernel
Date	2017-06-06 22:40 +0200
Message-ID	<tPtqF-5fp-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tPiEV-6IR-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 02:03:51 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 May 2017 12:51:54 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 22 May 2017 19:11:35 PDT (-0700), olof@lixom.net wrote:
>>>
>>>>  * Definitions like ARCH_HAS_SETUP_ADDITIONAL_PAGES, these are also present in
>>>>    other architectures.
>>>
>>> What is the warning here? I would assume that you should leave this
>>> unchanged as well.
>>
>> ERROR: #define of 'ARCH_HAS_SETUP_ADDITIONAL_PAGES' is wrong - use Kconfig variables or standard guards instead
>> #2533: FILE: arch/riscv/include/asm/elf.h:79:
>> +#define ARCH_HAS_SETUP_ADDITIONAL_PAGES
>
> Ok, you can definitely ignore this one. The warning is meant to prevent adding
> new macros like that, but the macro already exists in the other architectures,
> and I see no point in converting them all into a CONFIG_ symbol.

Sounds good.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 6/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/kernel Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> - 2017-05-25 04:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 6/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/kernel Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-05-25 22:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 6/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/kernel Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> - 2017-06-06 07:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 6/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/kernel Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-06-06 11:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 6/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/kernel Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> - 2017-06-06 22:40 +0200

csiph-web