Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1658681

Re: [PATCH] procfs: add smack subdir to attrs

From José Bollo <jobol@nonadev.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] procfs: add smack subdir to attrs
Date 2017-06-06 14:00 +0200
Message-ID <tPljs-8jR-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tNEgx-6Xe-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tNHR7-UQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tNIka-1mJ-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:59:24 -0700
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:

> On 6/1/2017 4:38 PM, James Morris wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >  
> >> Subject: [PATCH] procfs: add smack subdir to attrs  
> > Is there value in this without major stacking support?  
> 
> Yes. If a Smack aware application reads /proc/self/attr/current
> it has no way to know if what it sees is a Smack label or an
> SELinux context. True, the application can look elsewhere
> (i.e. /sys/kernel/security/lsm) to find out which is enabled.
> But the real fix is for Smack to use a different interface
> than SELinux. Which is what this does. True, it will be even
> more important when/if major stacking comes in, but it is still
> significant now, and I would like to have it regardless of
> the future acceptance of major stacking.

I agree that it is a nice forward movement to leave the mud.

I have a subsidiary question to ask. Should we keep the name 'attr' for
the subdirectory? It seems at least convenient but if a better name is
valuable (security, lsm, ...) why not to switch now?

BR josé

> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-security-module" in the body of a message to
> majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] procfs: add smack subdir to attrs Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - 2017-06-01 21:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] procfs: add smack subdir to attrs James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2017-06-02 01:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] procfs: add smack subdir to attrs Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - 2017-06-02 02:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] procfs: add smack subdir to attrs José Bollo <jobol@nonadev.net> - 2017-06-06 14:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] procfs: add smack subdir to attrs Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - 2017-06-06 16:50 +0200

csiph-web