Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1658526

[RFC PATCH 2/4] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling

Show all headers | View raw

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations

diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations b/Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..945ac5cfe55c12
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+Linux I2C and DMA
+-----------------
+
+Given that I2C is a low-speed bus where largely small messages are transferred,
+it is not considered a prime user of DMA access. At this time of writing, only
+10% of I2C bus master drivers have DMA support implemented. And the vast
+majority of transactions are so small that setting up DMA for it will likely
+add more overhead than a plain PIO transfer.
+
+Therefore, it is *not* mandatory that the buffer of an i2c message is DMA safe.
+It does not seem reasonable to apply additional burdens when the feature is so
+rarely used. However, it is recommended to use a DMA-safe buffer, if your
+message size is likely applicable for DMA (FIXME: > 8 byte?).
+
+To support this, drivers wishing to implement DMA can use a helper function
+checking if the size is suitable for DMA or if the buffer is DMA capable:
+
+	int i2c_check_msg_for_dma(msg, dma_threshold);
+
+Please check its in kernel documentation for details.
+
+It should be further noted that bounce buffer handling is left to be handled on
+driver level because details like alignment requirements are best known on that
+level.
+
+If you plan to use DMA with I2C (or with any other bus, actually) make sure you
+have CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG enabled during development. It can help you find
+various issues which can be complex to debug otherwise.
-- 
2.11.0

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[RFC PATCH 2/4] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> - 2017-06-06 11:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-06-06 12:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2017-06-06 12:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-06-06 12:40 +0200
        Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2017-06-06 13:00 +0200
          Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-06-06 13:20 +0200
            Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2017-06-06 13:30 +0200
              Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-06-06 17:30 +0200

csiph-web