Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1660266
| From | Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function sst_restore_shim64() |
| Date | 2017-06-07 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tPQZY-3HZ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tK5Il-48x-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 23 May 2017 02:12:58 +0200,
Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>
> Looks like the function has never been used since it was added by commit
> b0d94acd634a ("ASoC: Intel: mrfld - add shim save restore"). Removing it
> fixes the following warning when building with clang:
>
> sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c:360:20: error: unused function
> 'sst_restore_shim64' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Hmm, although this patch was already merged, I now think this is
rather a bug. If the restore is never executed, why the counterpart,
sst_save_shim64() is required at all at runtime suspend?
Vinod?
thanks,
Takashi
> ---
> sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c | 16 ----------------
> 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
> index f9ba71315e33..fb608d3a90c8 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
> @@ -397,22 +397,6 @@ static inline void sst_save_shim64(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx,
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
> }
>
> -static inline void sst_restore_shim64(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx,
> - void __iomem *shim,
> - struct sst_shim_regs64 *shim_regs)
> -{
> - unsigned long irq_flags;
> -
> - /*
> - * we only need to restore IMRX for this case, rest will be
> - * initialize by FW or driver when firmware is loaded
> - */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
> - sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_IMRX, shim_regs->imrx);
> - sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_CSR, shim_regs->csr);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
> -}
> -
> void sst_configure_runtime_pm(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx)
> {
> pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(ctx->dev, SST_SUSPEND_DELAY);
> --
> 2.13.0.303.g4ebf302169-goog
>
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function sst_restore_shim64() Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> - 2017-06-07 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function sst_restore_shim64() Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> - 2017-06-08 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function sst_restore_shim64() Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> - 2017-06-08 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function sst_restore_shim64() Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2017-06-09 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function sst_restore_shim64() Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> - 2017-06-09 09:10 +0200
csiph-web