Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1659782

Re: [PATCH v7 14/26] x86/insn-eval: Indicate a 32-bit displacement if ModRM.mod is 0 and ModRM.rm is 5

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:17:12AM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Section 2.2.1.3 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
> Developer's Manual volume 2A states that when ModRM.mod is zero and
> ModRM.rm is 101b, a 32-bit displacement follows the ModRM byte. This means
> that none of the registers are used in the computation of the effective
> address. A return value of -EDOM signals callers that they should not use
> the value of registers when computing the effective address for the
> instruction.
> 
> In IA-32e 64-bit mode (long mode), the effective address is given by the
> 32-bit displacement plus the value of RIP of the next instruction.
> In IA-32e compatibility mode (protected mode), only the displacement is
> used.
> 
> The instruction decoder takes care of obtaining the displacement.

...

> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> index 693e5a8..4f600de 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> @@ -379,6 +379,12 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
>  	switch (type) {
>  	case REG_TYPE_RM:
>  		regno = X86_MODRM_RM(insn->modrm.value);


<---- newline here.

> +		/*
> +		 * ModRM.mod == 0 and ModRM.rm == 5 means a 32-bit displacement
> +		 * follows the ModRM byte.
> +		 */
> +		if (!X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) && regno == 5)
> +			return -EDOM;
>  		if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value))
>  			regno += 8;
>  		break;
> @@ -730,9 +736,21 @@ void __user *insn_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  			eff_addr = base + indx * (1 << X86_SIB_SCALE(sib));
>  		} else {
>  			addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
> -			if (addr_offset < 0)

ditto.

> +			/*
> +			 * -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset.
> +			 * In such a case, in 64-bit mode the effective address
> +			 * relative to the RIP of the following instruction.
> +			 */
> +			if (addr_offset == -EDOM) {
> +				eff_addr = 0;
> +				if (user_64bit_mode(regs))
> +					eff_addr = (long)regs->ip +
> +						   insn->length;

Let that line stick out and write it balanced:

                        if (addr_offset == -EDOM) {
                                if (user_64bit_mode(regs))
                                        eff_addr = (long)regs->ip + insn->length;
                                else
                                        eff_addr = 0;

should be easier parseable this way.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
-- 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v7 14/26] x86/insn-eval: Indicate a 32-bit displacement  if ModRM.mod is 0 and ModRM.rm is 5 Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2017-06-07 15:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v7 14/26] x86/insn-eval: Indicate a 32-bit displacement  if ModRM.mod is 0 and ModRM.rm is 5 Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-06-15 21:40 +0200

csiph-web