Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1656572

Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/vm: Fix test for virtual address range mapping for arm64

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/vm: Fix test for virtual address range mapping for arm64
Date Fri, 02 Jun 2017 23:40:01 +0200
Message-ID <tO2sx-6xE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tItc6-2GL-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>, Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Reply-To shuah@kernel.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Cmae-Envelope MS4wfDDPML8GnOpBRGRn0vEzLjSnbuP6rNtXtqn3+anE6UsR0/N9eObZPXr0M8mP79N2VLTMRFPRKdc1z8MNBL8m1HaA3hSfC+53kN83+7StlC+qLKkUw8Yh do2Fp6nTvSgsdFeXXUTcdxmiz+6ifFg3u8ycoOM/8HPHh1uGFiq7vcmVgozIb7yhITJ4F8tVsu8ebCJHqVNiJwfCzPDy0T1AhSjQXI9/cMEN0C1AnAaVkakK 87+mEtu5fwTiWK9R+shO+Ctn/Tv7x/RcXJX94/esobvFUPXh9gdER7jTTtBgZCdlfKCmQmT87P77Q4IW1l9fHOTN0dbVzdywrLLZZF5nqMokZ6Wos7UH15uX a51nfk4X
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 110
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Date Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:38:38 -0600
X-Original-Message-ID <3c346b84-57c5-e39d-fe9b-6bfddfe0864f@kernel.org>
X-Original-References <20170518125258.2983-1-msuchanek@suse.de>
X-Original-Sender linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref csiph.com linux.kernel:1656572

Show key headers only | View raw


On 05/18/2017 06:52 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Arm64 has 256TB address space so fix the test to pass on Arm as well.
> 
> Also remove unneeded numaif header.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>

Thanks. Applied to linux-kselftest next for 4.13-rc1

-- Shuah

> ---
> v2:
>  - do not test high slices on Arm64 - it has no support and none is planned
>  - fix the hint calculation for different shift
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c
> index 3b02aa6eb9da..1830d66a6f0e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  #include <errno.h>
> -#include <numaif.h>
>  #include <sys/mman.h>
>  #include <sys/time.h>
>  
> @@ -32,15 +31,33 @@
>   * different areas one below 128TB and one above 128TB
>   * till it reaches 512TB. One with size 128TB and the
>   * other being 384TB.
> + *
> + * On Arm64 the address space is 256TB and no high mappings
> + * are supported so far.
>   */
> +
>  #define NR_CHUNKS_128TB   8192UL /* Number of 16GB chunks for 128TB */
> -#define NR_CHUNKS_384TB  24576UL /* Number of 16GB chunks for 384TB */
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_256TB   (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 2UL)
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_384TB   (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 3UL)
>  
>  #define ADDR_MARK_128TB  (1UL << 47) /* First address beyond 128TB */
> +#define ADDR_MARK_256TB  (1UL << 48) /* First address beyond 256TB */
> +
> +#ifdef __aarch64__
> +#define HIGH_ADDR_MARK  ADDR_MARK_256TB
> +#define HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT 49
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_LOW   NR_CHUNKS_256TB
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_HIGH  0
> +#else
> +#define HIGH_ADDR_MARK  ADDR_MARK_128TB
> +#define HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT 48
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_LOW   NR_CHUNKS_128TB
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_HIGH  NR_CHUNKS_384TB
> +#endif
>  
>  static char *hind_addr(void)
>  {
> -	int bits = 48 + rand() % 15;
> +	int bits = HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT + rand() % (63 - HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT);
>  
>  	return (char *) (1UL << bits);
>  }
> @@ -50,14 +67,14 @@ static int validate_addr(char *ptr, int high_addr)
>  	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) ptr;
>  
>  	if (high_addr) {
> -		if (addr < ADDR_MARK_128TB) {
> +		if (addr < HIGH_ADDR_MARK) {
>  			printf("Bad address %lx\n", addr);
>  			return 1;
>  		}
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (addr > ADDR_MARK_128TB) {
> +	if (addr > HIGH_ADDR_MARK) {
>  		printf("Bad address %lx\n", addr);
>  		return 1;
>  	}
> @@ -79,12 +96,12 @@ static int validate_lower_address_hint(void)
>  
>  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  {
> -	char *ptr[NR_CHUNKS_128TB];
> -	char *hptr[NR_CHUNKS_384TB];
> +	char *ptr[NR_CHUNKS_LOW];
> +	char *hptr[NR_CHUNKS_HIGH];
>  	char *hint;
>  	unsigned long i, lchunks, hchunks;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_128TB; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_LOW; i++) {
>  		ptr[i] = mmap(NULL, MAP_CHUNK_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>  					MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
>  
> @@ -99,7 +116,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  	}
>  	lchunks = i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_384TB; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_HIGH; i++) {
>  		hint = hind_addr();
>  		hptr[i] = mmap(hint, MAP_CHUNK_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>  					MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/vm: Fix test for virtual address range  mapping for arm64 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> - 2017-06-02 23:40 +0200

csiph-web